Re: Can ASP web application run in Linux?

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance

From: Jeff Cochran (jeff.nospam_at_zina.com)
Date: 03/03/05

  • Next message: Jeff Cochran: "Re: Unable to connect to Access 2000 database"
    Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 20:39:11 GMT
    
    

    On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 11:24:20 -0800, "Wilton Yuan" <wdyuan@telus.net>
    wrote:

    >I am dummy of Linux. Now company's owner wants to switch OS to Linux from
    >Windows because the cost issue.

    Good for the owner. He'll have a totally inexperienced staff to back
    it up, meaning consultants can finally earn a living. :)

    >We currently use ASP web application running in Windows 2000 Server with SQL
    >Server 7. If we change to Linux, can I continue to use the existing ASP web
    >application?

    Probably not as written, but with some modification you can run some
    ASP pages under Chilisoft or a MOD_ASP.

    >What web server and database does Linux use?

    Apache is normally the web server, database can be quite a few. If
    he's doing this for the cost he'll go for MySQL though.

    >If we cannot use
    >ASP, what should we use?

    ASP and Windows. You know it, it works and it'll cost a heck of a lot
    more in staff time to train and convert to a Linux option.

    That said, PhP, or maybe Perl would be the langauge of choice for your
    web/database work.

    >Does it really save money by using Linux?

    Yes. No. It depends.

    You can save on the OS licensing, as well as the database licensing.
    If you want a truly enterprise class operating system and database
    you'll actually pay more than for Windows and SQL Server, but you can
    often cut the number of boxes down and buy big iron instead. You pay
    more for competent Linux admins than Windows admins in most job
    markets, and you pay in time for converting apps and data formats.
    Hardware is basically a wash if you stick to the Intel world, though
    I'm amazed at how many companies switch to Linux for cost and dump
    enterprise class servers for white box desktops to run mission
    critical apps. If you're truly switching to Linux to take advantage
    of the technical benefits, you'll be buying IBM iSeries boxes with
    expensive DASD and multiple processors anyway, meaning you're making a
    heavy capital investment.

    Make sure you have your resume handy, the change will probably either
    force you out or just make you want to leave.

    Jeff


  • Next message: Jeff Cochran: "Re: Unable to connect to Access 2000 database"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Should we stay with M$
      ... Windows, and not on Linux. ... MS has a poor track record, has done since People started 'targetting' ... Apache does not have support for full-blown ASP ...
      (RedHat)
    • Re: Antivirus in FC3?
      ... >> without cost or effort. ... >> inability to manage a network of Windows computers with no regard to the ... I do not think of 'desktop computing' as a business workstation ... In the workstation market Linux ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: Access Viewer
      ... with Access Cost? ... But most people buy PCs with Windows pre-installed, ... They're uncomfortable with switching to a new operating system like Linux. ... My husband said "Just use 'Granny Spitz' and they'll know. ...
      (microsoft.public.access.conversion)
    • Re: Printer (and laptop) preferences?
      ... You also might consider the cost of ink. ... I just keep the Windows systems on my LAN, ... The Linux system is plugged into an additional router to ... Get a Windows system, buy Photoshop, learn it. ...
      (rec.photo.digital)
    • Re: PcLinux
      ... and it always seemed to be the windows computers having problems, ... statistics which indicate) that a properly secured linux or unix box is ... to do is worth more than the modest cost of the passable Microsoft OS ... I have no reason to bother trying it. ...
      (rec.crafts.metalworking)