Re: ASP vs ASP.NET

From: Paxton (paxtonend_at_[no-spam)
Date: 11/20/04 

Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 22:23:31 GMT

"WebMatrix" <WebMatrix@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:5861E74A-844F-4FDA-B171-E7B741FE880F@microsoft.com...
> Nathan,
>
<snip>
> If you were asked to develop a page that displays over thousands records,
> users want to be able to page through records, say 20 rec per page, and
> also
> they want to be able to sort by columns asc/desc. How long would it take
> you
> to develop something like that in ASP? How many lines of code would it
> take?
> Well, in ASP.NET I could put together a page like that in 20-30 min
> without a
> lot of coding. Taking a coffee break in between.
>

It doesn't take me very much longer in classic ASP. It's called *code
reuse*. Although the .NET datagrid control is very good.

<musing>I wonder how many .NET sites have inappropriate calendars stuffed
into them though........</musing>

P

Relevant Pages

  • Re: ASP vs ASP.NET
    ... It doesn't take me very much longer in classic ASP. ... Although the .NET datagrid control is very good. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet)
  • Re: ASP vs ASP.NET
    ... It doesn't take me very much longer in classic ASP. ... Although the .NET datagrid control is very good. ...
    (microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.general)
Loading