Re: ASP vs ASP.NET

Tech Tip: Click here to run a free scan for Windows Errors and optimize PC performance

From: Patrick.O.Ige (patrickige_at_acn.waw.pl)
Date: 11/20/04 

Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 16:20:27 +1100

Mr Jim Beam,
Are u anti microsoft?

"Jim Carlock" <anonymous@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
news:OKHnQ#qzEHA.2600@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> I'll give a counterpoint.
>
> 1) Take a look at the speed on Microsoft's own website.
> 2) Take a look at the broken links, missing pages, and the
> common mis-use of redirection.
> 3) Microsoft ABUSES redirection.
> 4) In all their abuse of redirection, they still have broken links.
>
> Realize these points...
>
> 1) Microsoft HAS the FASTEST computers in the world.
> 2) Microsoft HAS the FASTEST networks in the world.
> 3) Microsoft EMPLOYS the most SKILLED people in the world.
> 4) Microsoft BUILT the webservers they use.
> 5) There is NO EXCUSE at Microsoft (they have alot of problems).
>
> AND WITH everything they know, ask yourself if www.microsoft.com
> runs as fast as it could. And if it doesn't run as fast as a webpage
> should, what is the biggest limiting factor? Could the Microsoft
> employees do a better job with php or coldfusion or even with
> ASP.Net ?
>
> --
> Jim Carlock
> Post replies to newsgroup.
>
> "Nathan Sokalski" <njsokalski@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:%23iMXC%23pzEHA.1308@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> I was recently looking at a page about transitioning from ASP 3.0 to
> ASP.NET. (The page I was looking at is located at
> http://www.4guysfromrolla.com/webtech/041601-1.shtml ). It looks to me
like
> they are taking away what has always seemed to me like the beauty of ASP.
I
> always viewed the beauty of ASP as giving you the ability to fill in the
> dynamic areas without the need to change your HTML layout techniques. But
> ASP.NET seems to be trying to make you replace all HTML elements with
> ASP.NET code. For example, on the page I mentioned, notice how ASP.NET
code
> is used to create the submit button even though the submit button does not
> have any dynamic areas. Also, when initially designing a page, I have
always
> preferred to create it with HTML to make it look the way I want and then
> replace the dynamic areas with ASP. And just out of curiosity, for anyone
> who might know, will the "View Source" look the same? Because this is one
of
> the primary tools to make sure the code is producing what I want, I need
> this to look the same as it would using ASP. Does anyone else have an
> opinion on whether ASP.NET is really better? Even though I have not yet
> learned much about coding in ASP.NET, what I have seen makes me lean
towards
> ASP 3.0.
> --
> Nathan Sokalski
> njsokalski@hotmail.com
> www.nathansokalski.com
>
>
>

Quantcast