Re: Multiple copies of webbrowser control and site logins
From: Brian Cryer (brianc_at_127.0.0.1.activesol.co.uk)
Date: 12/24/04
- Next message: Joe: "Re: Multiple copies of webbrowser control and site logins"
- Previous message: Su Wei: "Re: Setting a charset in a Asynchronous Pluggable Protocol"
- In reply to: Joe: "Multiple copies of webbrowser control and site logins"
- Next in thread: Joe: "Re: Multiple copies of webbrowser control and site logins"
- Reply: Joe: "Re: Multiple copies of webbrowser control and site logins"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 13:17:55 -0000
"Joe" <not@home.com> wrote in message
news:41cb3121$0$19162$cc9e4d1f@news-text.dial.pipex.com...
> Hi,
>
> I have several processes accessing a website, each through a webbrowser
> control. I do not need to login to the site to access any information.
>
> However, to update data on the site I do. So if I log in to the site using
> one webbrowser control are all the other instances automatically logged
in?
My experience is limited here, but I think that if one is logged in then the
others won't be - because a separate session will be maintained for each.
> Will the admin of the site have available the info that I am running one
> process logged in and several that are not?
The only information that the site admin will have (if he/she cares to look)
will be the site access logs. These will record your IP address, the page(s)
you requested and a few other bits and bobs. I don't think you would be able
to glean any session related information from this, so no, I don't believe
it would be possible for the site admin to identify that you have one
process logged in and several that are not - at least not from looking at
the logs.
All the admin might notice is if you hit the site hard.
> If so, is there away of masking this information - without slowing access
to
> the site (particularly as I "hand code" GETs and PUTs)?
>
> I need to know as the system design of the program(s) will clearly be
> affected (in fact I've already written most of them). At the moment the
site
> places no restrictions on the number of logins and/or the number of
> processes, but at a whim they might, causing a major rewrite.
>
> I am not bombarding the site with requests, in fact I go through a global
> semaphore to make sure I limit concurrent requests to a minimum.
>
> TIA.
hope this helps,
Brian Cryer
www.cryer.co.uk/brian
- Next message: Joe: "Re: Multiple copies of webbrowser control and site logins"
- Previous message: Su Wei: "Re: Setting a charset in a Asynchronous Pluggable Protocol"
- In reply to: Joe: "Multiple copies of webbrowser control and site logins"
- Next in thread: Joe: "Re: Multiple copies of webbrowser control and site logins"
- Reply: Joe: "Re: Multiple copies of webbrowser control and site logins"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|