Re: Escaping both spaces and unsafe chars

From: Igor Tandetnik (itandetnik_at_mvps.org)
Date: 11/24/04 

Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 20:14:17 -0500

Yes, you are right. I could not make it escape a space after ? without
ICU_ENCODE_SPACES_ONLY flag, but then it does not escape other unsafe
characters. 

-- 
With best wishes,
    Igor Tandetnik
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not 
necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to 
land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly 
overhead. -- RFC 1925
"Jan" <biteme@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:%23l6ksAc0EHA.2016@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl
> Try:
>
> /cgi-bin/nph-fix2.exe?SomeFile 1.pdf
>
> Jan
>
> "Igor Tandetnik" <itandetnik@mvps.org> wrote in message
> news:eJDCKtb0EHA.3808@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>> "Jan" <biteme@nospam.com> wrote in message
>> news:%23qpaslb0EHA.1400@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl
>>> Is there any way to escape both unsafe chars and spaces in one call.
>>> The various functions to do this (CoInternetParseUrl,
>>> InternetCanonizeUrl, UrlCanoniconize  etc.) all seem to offer one or
>>> the other but not both simultaneously.
>>
>> InternetCanonicalizeUrl happily does both if run with dwFlags of 0 -
>> just tried it. I suspect UrlCanoniconize  would do the same.
>> --
>> With best wishes,
>>     Igor Tandetnik
>>
>> With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not
>> necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going
>> to land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly
>> overhead. -- RFC 1925