Re: Authentication how:to

From: Winfried Kaiser (w.kaiser_nospam__at_fortune.de)
Date: 03/01/04


Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 06:38:37 +0100

This braindead "security patch", which is a total overkill (and easily could
have been done much more intelligently without dropping the
URL-authentication feature), apparently created tons of problems, if you
look into the newsgroups.

Why, for heavens sake, was it necessary to drop the
"http://username:password@www.myserver.com" functionality? I firmly believe,
it was not! It would have been sufficient to make sure, that the URL-part
before the "@" used the correct syntax "username:password", and not
something like "http://www.fakeserver.com@www.evilserver.com", with which IE
easily allowed URL-spoofing.

The only good thing MS has done in that area is, that they have provided a
means to restore the old funtionality:

Put the following entries into a file (e.g. "iexplore.reg"), and doubleclick
on it. Then IE will work like before!

============================================================================
==========
Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Internet
Explorer\Main\FeatureControl\FEATURE_HTTP_USERNAME_PASSWORD_DISABLE]
"iexplore.exe"=dword:00000000

[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Internet
Explorer\Main\FeatureControl\FEATURE_HTTP_USERNAME_PASSWORD_DISABLE\iexplore
.exe]
"iexplore.exe"=dword:00000000
============================================================================
==========

-- 
Dipl.-Ing.(TH) Winfried Kaiser
c/o Fortune Systems GmbH & Co.
Postfach 1
24973 Husby
Germany
Fon: (0)4634-746
Fax: (0)4634-1517
"Mick" <mick.oneill@NOSPAM.advdata.com.au> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:Oc3IiX0$DHA.2632@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
>
> Since the new IE security update, out client application is experienceing
a
> UI problem, forcing the user to log in excessivly. The client (in VB)
> displays a WebBrowser control with a list of documents available on the
> server, as links. When the user clicks on the link, the document is opened
> in a new IE window. The user authentication is passed through the
WebBrowser
> headers, but when the IE window opens, it does not know of this
> authentication, and consequently prompts for it.
>
> Previously, we trapped the BeforeNavigate event, and then ShellExecuted
the
> link with the authentication passed as part of the URL. The new IE update
> has stopped this method of passing authentication to a URL, so it no
longer
> works.
>
> If someone could point me towards some documentation to provide a method
of
> passing the autehtication through to the new link, it would me very much
> appreciated.
>
> TIA
>
> Mick
>
>
---
Die eMail ist virenfrei.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.600 / Virus Database: 381 - Release Date: 28.02.2004


Relevant Pages

  • Re: Silly question
    ... Windows Authentication on your SQL server and control the access trough SQL ... > So I use window auth to check the user identity inside my ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.security)
  • Re: Silly question
    ... >You can use Windows Authentication to authenticate users. ... >usernames stored in your SQL database in a users Table ... >credentials to go to SQL server. ... >> So I use window auth to check the user identity inside ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.security)
  • Re: Basic Authentication and popup windows
    ... The secured site is opened in a separate window. ... This is when the Basic Authentication is performed. ... existing browser window, the authentication details are still valid ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.general)
  • Re: Basic Authentication and popup windows
    ... The secured site is opened in a separate window. ... This is when the Basic Authentication is performed. ... existing browser window, the authentication details are still valid ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.security)
  • Re: Q324929 bug??
    ... I said in a previous post that it worked if another window was open. ... know what it is like to have people telling you the symptoms. ... >>but since underscores aren't RFC compliant in DNS names, ... >>> We've just installed the Q324929 security patch and have ...
    (microsoft.public.security)