ISA and Exchange 2007
- From: Mark <Mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 12:16:01 -0700
I have been doing Exchange work for about 8 years now and during that time I
have never felt the need to incorporate an ISA server into an environment.
And here is my take on why I have not. ISA is just another level of
security. The reason I say this is that if you setup OWA correctly and use
SSL you are already connecting back to the organization using a secure
method. I'm a believer in keeping it simple therefore I have always seen ISA
as adding another level of complexity. Therefore my typical recommendation
is to keep your FE and BE server internal to the network. Setup the firewall
to allow ports 25 and 443 only to the front end servers. Setup SSL on the FE
servers. Now if you are a company or goverment agency that performs
extremely sensitive work then I can agree with incorporting an ISA but if you
are an ordinary company that doesn't deal with sensitive information when
what would be compelling reason to incorporate ISA? I've never used ISA so
that is why I'm here to get other people's take on this. It is my
understanding that you can do load balancing with an ISA server. However,
you can also setup Network Load Balancing to do this as well which I have
done in the past. I'd be happy to hear everyone's opion on this. Perhaps I
can be persuaded to use/recommend ISA or just reaffirm my current belief.
Thanks,
Mark
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ISA and Exchange 2007
- From: Jim Harrison \(ISA SE\)
- Re: ISA and Exchange 2007
- From: Phillip Windell
- Re: ISA and Exchange 2007
- Prev by Date: Re: Skype Block
- Next by Date: Re: ISA and Exchange 2007
- Previous by thread: Re: Skype Block
- Next by thread: Re: ISA and Exchange 2007
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|