Re: general question on design options
- From: "David" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:12:06 -0400
thanks. I appreciate the input.
"SMadaras" <SMadaras@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:D2BB9E6E-786B-4DD8-AB5C-F3F223D94491@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
David,
I'm running the configuration that you are considering. I have a Cisco
2800
series router with the K9 security package. It's configured as my edge
router
and handles all of my VPN connections and is configured as my first line
of
firewall defense. Behind that I have my ISA, which allows me greater
control
over publishing, policies, and bandwidth throttling. For the most part,
the
firewall configuration on the ISA mimics that on the Cisco, however if I
put
other public devices on the network between the Cisco and ISA (ie. in the
DMZ), I can poke holes for them specifically without effecting the
security
to my internal network.
I agree with Phillip that in many cases this could be just "burning
electricity", but even our IT auditors approved of the extra layer of
security. (Also like the fact that I no longer have a single point of
failure; if one device fails I can take it the loop and keep on
trucking..)
Hope this helps!
-Steve
"David" wrote:
thanks again.
"Phillip Windell" <philwindell@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ubAZvySBIHA.1168@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"David" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:e3G66eSBIHA.1184@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I was assuming it was going to be CSU/DSU -> cisco -> ISA, and that I
would have control of that cisco device. I have not dealt with T1
service
before (or any WAN technologies for that matter). We currently use a
fixed wireless provider and that antenna goes directly to my ISA
server.
So if I understand correctly, when I select a T1 provider it will come
with the csu/dsu *and* the router (likely cisco) which will likely
only
be a router (no nat, spi firewall, etc..)
Correct.
that I would not have administrative access to.
The depends on the arrangment with the ISP. I have access to ours. We
own
ours.
So if I wanted to implement a dmz for example, one with 2 firewalls
rather than one tri-homed firewall, the router that would likely come
with the service would not be an option and I would need to purchase
another one.
The router would have nothing to do with the DMZ. The router config
would
not be touched. You would have to buy a second Firewall device and
place
the two firewalls end-to-end with a "new" RFC Private Addressed Network
between the two Firewalls. Personally I think DMZs are most of the
time
just pointless and do nothing other than make things more complicated
for
the Admin (Hackers usualy don't notice and aren't slowed by them) and
they
just add more pieces to the puzzel that can fail and cause you to have
to
troubleshoot something and have more down-time.
--
Phillip Windell
www.wandtv.com
The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or
Microsoft, or anyone else associated with me, including my cats.
-----------------------------------------------------
Understanding the ISA 2004 Access Rule Processing
http://www.isaserver.org/articles/ISA2004_AccessRules.html
Troubleshooting Client Authentication on Access Rules in ISA Server
2004
http://download.microsoft.com/download/9/1/8/918ed2d3-71d0-40ed-8e6d-fd6eeb6cfa07/ts_rules.doc
Microsoft Internet Security & Acceleration Server: Partners
http://www.microsoft.com/isaserver/partners/default.asp
Microsoft ISA Server Partners: Partner Hardware Solutions
http://www.microsoft.com/forefront/edgesecurity/partners/hardwarepartners.mspx
-----------------------------------------------------
.
- References:
- general question on design options
- From: David
- Re: general question on design options
- From: Phillip Windell
- Re: general question on design options
- From: Phillip Windell
- Re: general question on design options
- From: David
- Re: general question on design options
- From: Phillip Windell
- Re: general question on design options
- From: David
- Re: general question on design options
- From: SMadaras
- general question on design options
- Prev by Date: Eventid 11004 after importing ruleset
- Next by Date: DMZ Novice
- Previous by thread: Re: general question on design options
- Next by thread: Re: general question on design options
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading