Re: UDP Rule Ignored
- From: "Will" <westes-usc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 23:19:42 -0700
Okay, I have a partial solution to this mystery, followed up with an even
worse behavior that I think must be a bug.
The reason ISA Server 2004 will show a packet in the monitor but not apply a
rule, is when it has no network rule. In this case, it lacked a routing
rule back into the one segment with the NTP server. Every other internal
network going out is by NAT.
Now, the worse behavior: having introduced an ISA Server 2004 Network rule
to route back traffic from the no man's land in to the NTP segment behind
the firewall, the traffic flies in and out of the firewall, but the monitor
doesn't see the packets at all!!
That has to be a bug?
--
Will
"Will" <westes-usc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:sZKdnZMXiPtZTFPZnZ2dnUVZ_r6dnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I have an ISA Server 2004 rule that seems to be not taking, and what isis
stranger is how the monitor is showing the packets.
One of our "internal" segments is a dedicated NTP server on Windows that
pretty much isolated on its segment and can only get out and in by NTP anda
proprietary superset of NTP that the vendor supports for the product.The
box had to be put behind ISA Server 2004 since it is our clock for all theI
internal domain controllers. I have several boxes in front of the ISA
Server 2004, in a no man's land that is behind yet another firewall, that
want the same NTP server to service. I could have published the UDPno
protocol on the NTP server on the ISA, but I decided to flex ISA's
capabilities and just route the dedicated internal NTP network out to the
man's land, and then I have a route on the no man's land to point back tothe
the NTP server on the dedicated internal NTP network using ISA Server 2004
as the "router".
What I see on the monitor of ISA Server 2004 baffles me. The route on
no man's land is working fine. The proprietary NTP UDP variant packetsAS
come in with a target IP pointing to the NTP server, presented on the
correct interface of the ISA Server 2004. But in the monitor ISA Server
2004 rejects the packets, and the baffling part is that it SHOWS NO RULE
MATCHING. I would expect if I had the rule wrong that the default ruleInstead,
would catch this packet and it would be rejected using that rule.
the packet is denied, and NO rule shows as matching on the Denied line of
monitor. What the heck would cause that behavior?!
--
Will
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: UDP Rule Ignored
- From: Will
- Re: UDP Rule Ignored
- References:
- UDP Rule Ignored
- From: Will
- UDP Rule Ignored
- Prev by Date: Re: Multihoming
- Next by Date: Re: UDP Rule Ignored
- Previous by thread: UDP Rule Ignored
- Next by thread: Re: UDP Rule Ignored
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|