Re: reverse web proxy
- From: "Paul Bergson" <pbergson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 22:19:19 -0600
Thanks for all your feedback
--
Paul Bergson MCT, MCSE, MCSA, CNE, CNA, CCA
http://www.pbbergs.com/
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"ZVR" <no_spam_ever@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:44066265$0$5650$9a6e19ea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Paul Bergson" <pbergson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:uuBmhRaPGHA.312@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Ok so I understood correctly the first time, plus I understand the system
itself then as well.
I'm not interested in creating a new set of complexities to rid myself of
a previous set. This has brought new issues to the front and it now
appears that he understands better the system and is working to help find
a solution. To be fair, we have at least 15 separate in bound
connections with firewalls. We have a mid sized firm that is
experiencing growing pains.
I see. Well it's always better if what you already have can do the job,
provided you get everybody on the same page. Good luck with the setup!
Cheers,
Virgil
.
- References:
- Re: reverse web proxy
- From: Paul Bergson
- Re: reverse web proxy
- From: ZVR
- Re: reverse web proxy
- From: Paul Bergson
- Re: reverse web proxy
- From: ZVR
- Re: reverse web proxy
- From: Paul Bergson
- Re: reverse web proxy
- From: ZVR
- Re: reverse web proxy
- Prev by Date: Re: Reporting
- Next by Date: Re: Blocking Access
- Previous by thread: Re: reverse web proxy
- Next by thread: Re: reverse web proxy
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|