Re: reverse web proxy



It isn't as bad as you are interpreting it.

As far as the reverse proxy would better fullfil my purposes if I could
point to servers w/o having to have them in the same location. I'm unsure
as to why a translation table can't be defined pointing to ip addresses.
Why a firewall between the two shouldn't matter, it is only communication.
I could stick 20 firewalls back to back to back and as long as the routes
and policies are setup they will all work. The way the reverse web proxy
works it has to have the published servers define their gatewqay as the ISA
server (I believe that is how it works) this is the limitation in my eyes.

--


Paul Bergson MCT, MCSE, MCSA, CNE, CNA, CCA
http://www.pbbergs.com/

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.


"Phillip Windell" <@.> wrote in message
news:u83rFKHPGHA.3272@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Paul Bergson" <pbergson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:O4JAf4%23OGHA.312@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I believe I will attempt to go via a side by side firewall but this (In
my
mind) defeats the purpose of only wanting ISA to be a reverse web proxy
in
my design attempt.

No it does not, defeat the purpose. It is exactly what would be expected
to
have to do to accomplish this. Web Publishig requires two Nics,..one on
the
Public side and one on the private side.

You *real* problem is the "firewall folks" who refuse to do their job. It
is
their job to do this using the firewalls when it is required. They are not
"gods" and they don't run the company (I wouldn't think),...they have
bosses,..somewhere,...find their bosses. Make them do their jobs. I am a
one-man IT Dept here, I run it all,...but if it is decided that the
company
wants something put into place,..it is my job to do it,...whether I like
it
or not.

--
Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
www.wandtv.com




.



Relevant Pages

  • Newbie: Help Excluding Records from a Table using multiple rows from another table
    ... App_ID int ... (Purpose: Maps Svrs to Applications) ... I want to Return All of the Servers not Assigned ... Loop to handle the multiple rows, but the examples I've seen on ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming)
  • Re: Bridgeheads
    ... The first site - Austin - has no servers listed. ... selected under the box "This server is a preferred bridgehead server for ... I really don't think they are serving any purpose. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory)
  • Re: Active Directory in DMZ - security
    ... Probably because DCs shouldn't be placed on DMZ, but if you want to take the risk and because the only purpose is to serve DMZ servers the best that I can think of at the moment is to use IPSec to restrict communications only between the DC and the servers that need AD access, don't forget to closely monitor those servers and define actions in case of security risk or failure, also have a look at: ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory)
  • Alternative to xsendkeys?
    ... I'm having issues over here with xsendkeys (part of the lineakd package), ... Purpose: We want to send a simple key event to remote and local X servers ... Note that there various different X servers involved. ...
    (comp.windows.x)