Re: Firewall override proxy ??
- From: "ZVR" <nospamever@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 13:38:17 -0500
First of all, you should not use the option "Require all users to
authenticate" to restrict anonymous access. You do that (properly) by not
configuring any 'anonymous' access rules (that is, rules that permit access
to "All Users").
Second, if a proxy is set in the Internet Options dialog, AFAIK the request
will be sent to the web proxy service regardless whether the client is also
a FWC. The firewall client will take over only for 'direct' requests (like
those coming from a SNAT client without proxy settings, for example).
Third, what exactly are you trying to accomplish? To me it seems that you
are using a somewhat twisted logic for something that might be easier to
achieve than you think.
Virgil
"Ammar" <Ammar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:D7C0DEB6-2329-4C30-9901-7E91D3A615B4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hi
> i want to ask
> If a client have (Firewall Client) installed,and he is configured to use
> his
> ISA2004 as his proxy server(so he is also a proxy client)
> when he request a page form the internet (HTTP request),the ISA 2004 will
> treat him as a firewall client or as proxy client ?
>
> i want to know because i disabled the web proxy filter to the HTTP
> protocol,and i have (require all users to authenticate)is enable in the
> ISA2004 web proxy engin.
> So if a firewall client request an HTTP request,he will not be faced with
> the (require all users to authenticate) because he will not be redirected
> to
> the PROXY engin.and he has to pass the access rules only
.
- Prev by Date: No domain users
- Next by Date: Re: No domain users
- Previous by thread: No domain users
- Next by thread: Re: No rule application !!!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
