Re: IIS server+SQL in DMZ and ISA 2004 question
- From: "Thomas W Shinder [MVP]" <tshinder@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 04:57:12 -0500
Hi Marlon,
Check out my answer on the isaserver.org boards.
HTH,
--
Tom
Get your questions answered at:
http://forums.isaserver.org
Get the book!
Tom and Deb Shinder's Configuring ISA Server 2004
http://tinyurl.com/3xqb7
MVP -- ISA Firewalls
FACT: Firewalls need at least two interfaces -- put a second NIC in that ISA
firewall!
"Marlon Brown" <nospamarlon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Ose6lBEfFHA.3936@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
: My main website pulls data from a SQL db.
:
: Traditionally I understand folks would setup the IISserver + SQL server in
: the "DMZ" and keep it in sync with a SQL server in the internal network.
My
: main SQL server resides in "internal" network and it is SAN attached.
:
: My question is this, if I publish the web server using a reverse-proxy
(ISA
: 2004), do you think it is necessary put the SQL server in DMZ (in a 3-leg
: configuration NIC-External, NIC-Perimeter and NIC-internal, I would put
the
: SQL and IIS server in the "Perimeter" network and I would publish the web
: server there).
:
: Can you tell me whether folks using a reverse-proxy (ISA) to publish IIS
: servers + SQL connected and normally would still put the SQL server in the
: DMZ ?
: What do you think ?
:
:
:
:
:
.
- References:
- IIS server+SQL in DMZ and ISA 2004 question
- From: Marlon Brown
- IIS server+SQL in DMZ and ISA 2004 question
- Prev by Date: Re: Redirecting requests?
- Next by Date: Re: Simplify ISA logs?
- Previous by thread: IIS server+SQL in DMZ and ISA 2004 question
- Next by thread: web proxy filter
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|