Re: VPN, split DNS and name resolution
From: Phillip Windell (_at_.)
Date: 02/11/05
- Next message: Phillip Windell: "Re: 1 to 1 NAT Rule"
- Previous message: Thomas W Shinder [MVP]: "Re: VPN, split DNS and name resolution"
- In reply to: Thomas W Shinder [MVP]: "Re: VPN, split DNS and name resolution"
- Next in thread: Phillip Windell: "Re: VPN, split DNS and name resolution"
- Reply: Phillip Windell: "Re: VPN, split DNS and name resolution"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:53:00 -0600
"Thomas W Shinder [MVP]" <tshinder@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:O3J7ZTFEFHA.3032@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Do a google on split DNS and you'll learn the benefits and why
recommending
> against it is only a hack and short term fix.
Hi Tom,
I know we've talked about this both in NGs and in person, but I am still not
"sold" on Split-DNS, but I am willing to to look into a little more and try
to keep an open mind. But I don't want overwhelmed with dozens or maybe
hundreds of links to dig through with Google. Is there one decent consise
document that contains enough information without burying me with it that
might convince me that this method is the best way go? I'll admit I am
biased against it almost to the point of it being a "religous decision", but
I will put some effort in looking it over if I am pointed in the right
direction.
-- Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA] www.wandtv.com
- Next message: Phillip Windell: "Re: 1 to 1 NAT Rule"
- Previous message: Thomas W Shinder [MVP]: "Re: VPN, split DNS and name resolution"
- In reply to: Thomas W Shinder [MVP]: "Re: VPN, split DNS and name resolution"
- Next in thread: Phillip Windell: "Re: VPN, split DNS and name resolution"
- Reply: Phillip Windell: "Re: VPN, split DNS and name resolution"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|