Re: Excluding internal IPs from being proxied
From: A.Klimkin (aklimkin)
Date: 11/19/04
- Next message: iwannabfishn: "Installing Firewall Client Share after ISA server 2004"
- Previous message: Phillip Windell: "Re: Excluding internal IPs from being proxied"
- In reply to: Phillip Windell: "Re: Excluding internal IPs from being proxied"
- Next in thread: Phillip Windell: "Re: Excluding internal IPs from being proxied"
- Reply: Phillip Windell: "Re: Excluding internal IPs from being proxied"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 18:31:13 +0300
I see, Phillip.
And now please take a look at the following ISA web log excerpt (.80 is my
workstation, .1 is ISA2004 firewall and .210 is some internal host I'm
trying to get access to via its IP address):
192.168.0.80, MYDOMAIN\aklimkin, Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows
NT 5.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322), -, 11/19/2004, 10:50:00, -, RWALL, -,
192.168.0.210,192.168.0.1, 8080, 1, 367, 1907, http, TCP, GET,
http://192.168.0.210/, -, -, 12202, 0x0, Default rule, -, Internal,
Internal, 0x80, Denied
This log entry says that since I do not have firewall policy that allows web
access from Internal to Internal, the request is denied. If I create the
appropriate rule, the request will be allowed.
But what I'm *really* talking about in my previous post is that the ISA
*correctly* treats the request as being destined to the internal network, as
it shown in the above log entry.
So I came to the conclusion that incorrect URL string parsing is not the
case. The point is the request should *never* be processed by web proxy
service since I confgured this via 'Bypass proxy for Web servers in this
network' web browser configuration option. And I discovered that this
configuration option does not work as it's intended to. And I found a
workaround that has been listed in previous post, too.
I don't say that my claims are absolutely right. If someone could perform
the same test on their environment, they could confirm or disprove my
conclusions. And then, of course, share with us their test results.
Regards,
Andrew
"Phillip Windell" <@.> wrote in message
news:OuLm3OkzEHA.2572@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Yea. Like we were saying in the other posts, I think it is pretty simple.
> It is just seeing the "dots" in the IP# and interpreting it to be a FQDN
and
> trying to resolve it. I am not a programmer but I think the logic (which
> may be flawed) goes like this:
>
> If string contains "dots" then
> It is a FQDN, treat accordingly
> Else
> It is a Netbios Name, treat accordingly
> End if
>
>
> **Maybe it should really go like this:**
>
> If string contains "dots" then
> Test if it is a FQDN or IP#, Split sections between "dots"
> If all four sections are a number between 0 and 255 then
> It is an IP#, treat accordingly
> Else
> It is a FQDN, treat accordingly
> Else
> It is a Netbios Name, treat accordingly
> End if
>
>
> Again I am not a programmer and I have no idea how it is really coded, I
am
> only trying to describe what I think the behavor is.
>
> --
>
> Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
> www.wandtv.com
>
>
> "A.Klimkin" <aklimkin at mail dot ru> wrote in message
> news:%23UOmXbizEHA.3376@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> > Hello NG!
> >
> > Latest ontopic conversations in this newsgroup prompted me to perform
some
> > additional testing, and I discovered the following interesting thing.
> > For me it seems that the 'Bypass proxy for Web servers in this network'
> web
> > browser configuration option for internal network object does not work
at
> > all. Whether this options is checked, or not - [for some **cking reason]
> you
> > cannot access the internal web resources via IP addresses. Web proxy log
> > contains appropriate 'Denied' entries clearly saying that requests to
> > internal net passes through the web proxy service.
> > I resolved the issue by entering the whole internal network IP range in
> the
> > 'Directly access this servers or domains:' list. After applying the
> firewall
> > policy changes, everything starts to work exactly as it should -
requests
> to
> > internal resources via IP address no more being passed to web proxy
> service
> > and directly hits the destination.
> > Could anyone confirm the same behavior with his ISA2004 environment?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Andrew
> >
> >
>
>
- Next message: iwannabfishn: "Installing Firewall Client Share after ISA server 2004"
- Previous message: Phillip Windell: "Re: Excluding internal IPs from being proxied"
- In reply to: Phillip Windell: "Re: Excluding internal IPs from being proxied"
- Next in thread: Phillip Windell: "Re: Excluding internal IPs from being proxied"
- Reply: Phillip Windell: "Re: Excluding internal IPs from being proxied"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|