Re: It is not the case
From: A.Klimkin (aklimkin)
Date: 10/13/04
- Next message: Fabio: "Isa 2004 Anti-virus"
- Previous message: A.Klimkin: "Re: HELP with inbound Ports 25, 80"
- In reply to: Phillip Windell: "Re: It is not the case"
- Next in thread: Sergio Fonseca [MVP]: "Re: It is not the case"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 18:03:47 +0400
OK. I see. Thanks!
Regards,
Andrew
"Phillip Windell" <@.> wrote in message
news:et9$dYSsEHA.820@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> 127.0.0.1 is specifically a loopback address. I suspect that the proxying
> services aren't going to treat it the same as a legitiment IP#. It was
just
> a "hunch".
>
> --
>
> Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
> www.wandtv.com
>
> "A.Klimkin" <aklimkin at mail dot ru> wrote in message
> news:uMiae%23BsEHA.2580@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> > Thanks, Phillip. It works.
> > Do you have got any explanation of this behavior? In other words, is
this
> a
> > bug or feature?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Andrew
> >
> > "Phillip Windell" <@.> wrote in message
> > news:%23pe8Cu6rEHA.3520@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> > > Don't use 127.0.0.1. Use the actual IP# of the machine in the browser
> > > settings.
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
> > > www.wandtv.com
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
- Next message: Fabio: "Isa 2004 Anti-virus"
- Previous message: A.Klimkin: "Re: HELP with inbound Ports 25, 80"
- In reply to: Phillip Windell: "Re: It is not the case"
- Next in thread: Sergio Fonseca [MVP]: "Re: It is not the case"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
