RE: Firewall service unavailable !!
From: TheLord (TheLord_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 07/05/04
- Next message: Jim Harrison [MSFT]: "Re: ISA 2K Recommendation Firewall vs Integrated Mode"
- Previous message: Ian Francis: "Re: Opening ports..."
- In reply to: sandaruwan: "Firewall service unavailable !!"
- Next in thread: Phillip Windell: "Re: Firewall service unavailable !!"
- Reply: Phillip Windell: "Re: Firewall service unavailable !!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2004 15:15:02 -0700
Hi sandaruwan,
Thanks for replying to my questions.
the LAT already has the local IP range only, and the packet filter is already enabled.
for those two IPs, i blocked them and blocked the range of it using IP Packet Filter with these settings: "please correct me if i'm mistaking"
Blocking IP (In) 24.x.x.x
Description :
Enabled : True
Filter Mode : Block
Filter Type : Custom
Protocol : Any
Direction : Inbound and Outbound
Local Port: Any Port
Remote Port : Any Port
Local Computer Filter Applies to this IP : Default External IP
Remote Computer Filter Applies to Network : 24.0.0.0 / 255.0.0.0
Blocking IP (In) 66.x.x.x
Description :
Enabled : True
Filter Mode : Block
Filter Type : Custom
Protocol : TCP
Direction : Inbound
Local Port : Any Port
Remote Port : Any Port
Local Computer Filter Applies to this IP : Default External IP
Remote Computer Filter Applies to Network : 66.0.0.0 / 255.0.0.0
Blocking IP (In) 66.36.240.144
Description :
Enabled : True
Filter Mode : Block
Filter Type : Custom
Protocol : Any
Direction : Inbound and Outbound
Local Port: Any Port
Remote Port : Any Port
Local Computer Filter Applies to this IP : Default External IP
Remote Computer Filter Applies to Host: 66.36.240.144
even after blocking them i found them in the sessions. i restarted the services but it didn't do anything. i restarted the server and nothing changed also. after maybe 1hr they disappeared and another IPs jumped in, causing the same problem. but they were in a different range, they were 65.x.x.x, 64.x.x.x, 80.x.x.x, 82.x.x.x, 24.x.x.x ...
any other suggestions ?!
"sandaruwan" wrote:
> HI "theload"
> i would like you to ask to check basic configuration.
> 1. check your LAT table weather that you have only
> included the Local ip range?
> 2.check weather have you enable the packet filters?
> 3.just for the moment block that 2 ip address full access
> to the network?
> 4. this can be happend if ur isa server become open proxy
> server . i faced that problem and wht i was done is
> reimplement the isa server
>
> if you can post it ur new status, that will be great
>
> sandaruwan
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >hi there,
> >
> >i have ISA 2000 installed on a server.
> >one day, i checked the monitoring and found the Firewall
> Service unavailable.! so i started the service. after
> about 3 to 4hrs, it became unavailable again!!. so, i
> started monitoring the service and found out that there
> are many firewall sessions "(about 300 - 600 in the
> services monitoring)", i checked the "sessions monitoring"
> and there is only 2 firewall sessions! i was shocked that
> 2 firewall sessions are causing this. when i "abort
> session" those IPs, when i go back to the Services, the
> sessions went back to 2. those IPs doesn't belong to the
> internal network. this is 1 of the IPs, 66.36.240.144 and
> the other starts with 24.x.x.x.
> >
> >and i've noticed when i keep the sessions go up in
> numbers, the firewall service becomes unavailable. i
> checked the firewall log file and found out those 2 IPs
> are trying to attack port 25 from any port. so i made an
> IP Packet Filter for port 25. but that didn't work.
> >
> >can someone please give me a hint on what to do? i'm
> facing this problem since about 1 month and i've been
> searching here and there, i even posted a thread in
> isaserver.org, but no answer.
> >
> >i'll be thankful
> >.
> >
>
- Next message: Jim Harrison [MSFT]: "Re: ISA 2K Recommendation Firewall vs Integrated Mode"
- Previous message: Ian Francis: "Re: Opening ports..."
- In reply to: sandaruwan: "Firewall service unavailable !!"
- Next in thread: Phillip Windell: "Re: Firewall service unavailable !!"
- Reply: Phillip Windell: "Re: Firewall service unavailable !!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|