Re: Thoughts on ISA 2004 BETA
From: Thomas W Shinder [MVP] (tshinder_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 04/29/04
- Next message: Phillip Windell: "Re: Thoughts on ISA 2004 BETA"
- Previous message: Thomas W Shinder [MVP]: "Re: NetMeeting and ISA Server 2004"
- In reply to: a: "Thoughts on ISA 2004 BETA"
- Next in thread: Phillip Windell: "Re: Thoughts on ISA 2004 BETA"
- Reply: Phillip Windell: "Re: Thoughts on ISA 2004 BETA"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 12:14:24 -0500
Hi A,
inline...
-- Tom www.isaserver.org/shinder ISA Server and Beyond: http://tinyurl.com/1jq1 Configuring ISA Server: http://tinyurl.com/1llp ISA Server and Beyond Seminars - http://tinyurl.com/9sce MVP -- ISA Server 2000 "a" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:81370C9A-B482-4B3E-80D9-91FD95AE6265@microsoft.com... : 1. Get rid of MMC. You lose too much screen area to sidebars and other trash that is not needed. ==>the ISA 2004 is very bulky, I agree. I think they should have optimized it for 800x600, not 1024x768 : 2. Logging is still weak and needs some improvements. ==>the logging feature is actually very good, since you pay through the nose to get comparable logging capabilities with CP or PIX. You can always buy an add-on to get the same functionality and the same TCO :-) : 3. A Man with two left brains designed the ISA MMC console screens. Pretty pictures! ==>I think that's two right brains, if you like the art work :-) : 4. Though I like many of the quick guides I feel like I am being talked down to. Now kiddies this is what a network looks like with only one network, this is what it looks like with two networks. Sorry, you can not pick that one please try again. ==>Not everyone is a firewall or networking expert, but they still need a firewall. Even the pros can benefit from a helping hand. Its a LOT easier to work with than the dreaded CP interface, and the PIX interface acts like it was dropped on its head at birth! : 5. Thank goodness it is still in BETA. Cisco and Checkpoint has nothing to fear from this product. ==>Actually, I think they have a LOT to fear. Cisco isn't much of a firewall, its a router with some simple "fixups" etc and packet filter. Packet filtering routers have there place, but in the 21st century, I don't think of them as firewalls any more. Maybe the hackers are less sophisticated where you're from :-) CP is getting close in terms of layer 7 awareness, but its hopeless UI and prohibitive cost and learn curve make it only second best. : 6. This is a vast improvement over the old proxy but ISA 2004 as a Firewall product is still lacking. Manual rule definitions don't always work as they should. Microsoft networking gets in the way. What you define in a rule is not what you get. There is no strong policy checking and logging that I can see to validate security settings. ==>I think you mean to say that as a packet filter based router its lacking. But as a firewall, it really sets the standard. The myth of the hardware router is pretty much busted; ASIC and "add on app filter" cards can't keep up with modern software based firewall. However, a router and a firewall aren't the same thing, so if you need both, you need to buy both. Plus, you need those ASICs on the front-end if you have an OC12+ line, 'cause the software based firewalls can't keep up. : 7. This product does have superior feedback from users, MVPs and Microsoft personnel. Checkpoints support system is so weak any other product is worth the try. Cisco continues to make itself as proprietary as possible in order to gain the greatest dependency on their own support system. ==>Another reason to stay away from CP -- poor support and Byzantine interface, as well as an insane licensing scheme. You get better firewall features, comparable performance (depending on hardware) and far, far better support with ISA 2004, which I'm happy to say is now a real firewall. HTH, Tom
- Next message: Phillip Windell: "Re: Thoughts on ISA 2004 BETA"
- Previous message: Thomas W Shinder [MVP]: "Re: NetMeeting and ISA Server 2004"
- In reply to: a: "Thoughts on ISA 2004 BETA"
- Next in thread: Phillip Windell: "Re: Thoughts on ISA 2004 BETA"
- Reply: Phillip Windell: "Re: Thoughts on ISA 2004 BETA"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|