Re: Shares on vpn-server
From: Phillip Windell (_at_.)
Date: 05/05/04
- Next message: Phillip Windell: "Re: shares on RRAS-server"
- Previous message: Karel Van Dorpe: "shares on RRAS-server"
- In reply to: Karel Van Dorpe: "Shares on vpn-server"
- Next in thread: Karel Van Dorpe: "Re: Shares on vpn-server"
- Reply: Karel Van Dorpe: "Re: Shares on vpn-server"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 15:27:11 -0500
The Routers would have to be the VPN Servers not the DCs. It would have to
be rigged as a "Site-to-Site VPN" not as a Remote Access VPN. If the
Routers can't do this then you have to replace them with something that can
or redesign the LAN topology in both LANs so the Windows Servers have two
NICs with RRAS setup with a Site-to-Site VPN.
-- Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA] www.wandtv.com "Karel Van Dorpe" <karel.van.dorpe@pandora.be> wrote in message news:%23jh4e3tMEHA.1388@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > Hi, > > On the screenshot you see the structure of both sites that I'm connecting. > DC1/VPN1 and DC2/VPN2 are as well domain controller as RRAS-server. > Both servers have only one NIC. > On that nic there are 3 IP-addresses (one from router and 2 from the demand- > dial-interfaces). > The DC's replicate perfectly en they can use each others shares. > The XP-clients are member of the domain. > I would like the clients to reach the remote shares but I don't know which T > CP/IP settings they need. > I think is has something to do with routing but I can't figure out. > Can somebody please help? > > Thank you. > Karel > > >
- Next message: Phillip Windell: "Re: shares on RRAS-server"
- Previous message: Karel Van Dorpe: "shares on RRAS-server"
- In reply to: Karel Van Dorpe: "Shares on vpn-server"
- Next in thread: Karel Van Dorpe: "Re: Shares on vpn-server"
- Reply: Karel Van Dorpe: "Re: Shares on vpn-server"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading