Re: DSCP with GRE?
From: Jim Harrison [MSFT] (jmharr_at_online.microsoft.com)
Date: 06/18/04
- Next message: Jim Harrison [MSFT]: "Re: Closing Ports!"
- Previous message: Cat2k1: "Re: Closing Ports!"
- In reply to: InBan: "Re: DSCP with GRE?"
- Next in thread: InBan: "Re: DSCP with GRE?"
- Reply: InBan: "Re: DSCP with GRE?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 14:44:50 -0700
Propagated, perhaps, but not used or managed as would be expected with "real" diffsrv support.
-- Jim Harrison [ISASE] Read the help, books and articles! This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. "InBan" <InBan@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:988290CB-C9D1-4C5D-AC45-5F933F087340@microsoft.com... Apparently the information provided here is incorrect; ToS field is propogated from the internal packet. "InBan" wrote: > Thanks for your time, I'll copy the thread into a new post in an RRAS forum. > > "Jim Harrison [MSFT]" wrote: > > > You're right; this is where I'd direct you to one of our RRAS forums. > > ...sorry... > > > > -- > > Jim Harrison [ISASE] > > Read the help, books and articles! > > > > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. > > > > > > "InBan" <InBan@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:4F44C707-BFC7-47DE-BC0B-495B50033FFB@microsoft.com... > > Well; that is how it was looking to me. Thank You for confirming this. > > > > I am still looking for methods of prioritizing VPN traffic. In a multi-site topology where VPN tunnels create the inter-site > > backbone, a QoS method is essential. Mission critical applications running over WAN links are severely affected by things like > > VOIP, > > NetMeeting, replication and large file transfers. At this point it seems that we need a third party tool to help us accomplish > > this, > > but I am not aware of a product that will integrate well into our existing infrastructure. > > > > Another possibility is to find a method to direct different priority traffic over different tunnels; ideally priority would be > > based > > on protocol, rather than user. Then find a method of prioritizing the tunnels themselves. This concept also jives more with my > > understanding of PPP based tunnels and their requirement for continuity. As I understand it reordering a tunnel’s packets based > > on > > DSCP priority would cause fragmentation that would violate the continuity requirement. > > > > Any suggestions on methods or resources on this topic would be greatly appreciated. Are there plans for additional support for > > various QoS methods in ISA 2004 or future implementations of RRAS? > > > > Thank you for responses, I appreciate this discussion may be outside the scope of this forum. > > > > > > "Jim Harrison [MSFT]" wrote: > > > > > Nope; RRAS doesn't "get" diffsrv either. > > > > > > -- > > > Jim Harrison [ISASE] > > > Read the help, books and articles! > > > > > > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. > > > > > > > > > "InBan" <InBan@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:169ADA9C-4293-4F2F-9F81-5F8F438ADBD5@microsoft.com... > > > Is this possible in RRAS? > > > > > > "Jim Harrison [MSFT]" wrote: > > > > > > > ISA wasn't designed with diffsrv in mind. > > > > ISA wasn't designed to be a router at all; Windows handles that part. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Jim Harrison [ISASE] > > > > Read the help, books and articles! > > > > > > > > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. > > > > > > > > > > > > "InBan" <InBan@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:319C0CEC-27B5-477C-955A-899DB527D3F6@microsoft.com... > > > > Does anyone know of a method in which ISA is capable of updating the IP headers of GRE packets with DiffServ information > > > > from > > > > the > > > > ToS field of the IP Header that is encapsulated in the GRE packet? > > > > > > > > This would allow DSCP aware routers on the Internet to prioritize traffic based on the ToS field of the GRE packets IP > > > > header. > > > > CISCO's IOS can do it, why can't ISA? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
- Next message: Jim Harrison [MSFT]: "Re: Closing Ports!"
- Previous message: Cat2k1: "Re: Closing Ports!"
- In reply to: InBan: "Re: DSCP with GRE?"
- Next in thread: InBan: "Re: DSCP with GRE?"
- Reply: InBan: "Re: DSCP with GRE?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|