Re: ISA2004 blocks Google desktop?
- From: "lforbes" <lforbes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 20:46:01 -0800
Hi,
I think we have a few crossed wires. When I said "User authentication
required" I meant removing "All Users" and setting up Groups instead using
Windows Domain Authentication in the Access Rules. I didn't know there was a
specific setting with that exact terminology? I just used that as a sentence
to describe the authentication being a requirement for access to the internet
=).
Where is that specific setting? I cannot remember seeing it.
Anyway. Thanks for clearing that up.
Cheers,
Lara
"Phillip Windell" wrote:
> "lforbes" <lforbes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:767E769A-B6E8-4F05-A7D6-31E09B857B17@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Hi,
> >
> > Actually the User Authentication is the entire reason we bought ISA =).
>
> And why do you think what I said means you don't have that? The setting
> "User Authentication Required" does not mean that there is no user is forced
> to authenticate without it. What is means is that enabling that setting
> prevents any "anonymous rules" from working even if you create them and it
> means you can not have any SecureNAT Clients. But if you just don't create
> any Anoymous Rules in the first place then you whole issue never exists in
> the first place.
>
> > have hardware routers blocking pretty much everything and hardware cache
> > engines. I have three extremely useful purposes for User Domain
> > Authentication required.
>
> No. You just create the Access Rules that require User accounts and you
> will have that.
> Leave the "User Authentication Required" disabled.
>
> > 1> No outside user can bring any computer into my network and have
> Internet
> > Access. This is a great way of preventing users from accessing the
> Internet
> > without my permission. Usually the only reason they would want to hook
> their
> > computer up to my network would be internet access. As they don't have it,
> > they don't bring in their computers and risk infecting my network with
> virus'
> > etc.
>
> You just create the Access Rules that require User accounts and you will
> have that.
> Leave the "User Authentication Required" disabled. As far as infecting your
> network,...they could do that anyway. What you are doing isnt' going to
> prevent that.
>
> > 2> I can block Access to the Internet via user name. I can also allow and
> > block specific sites for certain users.
>
> I do that same thing. The setting for "User Authentication Required" doesn't
> have anything to do with it.
>
> > 3> The most important - I can track when and where users go and every
> > site/image they hit. This is extremely useful and I use it a lot to make
> sure
> > users are not going to sites they are not allowed to go.
>
> Same as previous answer.
>
> --
> Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
> www.wandtv.com
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Understanding the ISA 2004 Access Rule Processing
> http://www.isaserver.org/articles/ISA2004_AccessRules.html
>
> Microsoft Internet Security & Acceleration Server: Guidance
> http://www.microsoft.com/isaserver/techinfo/Guidance/2004.asp
> http://www.microsoft.com/isaserver/techinfo/Guidance/2000.asp
>
> Microsoft Internet Security & Acceleration Server: Partners
> http://www.microsoft.com/isaserver/partners/default.asp
>
> Deployment Guidelines for ISA Server 2004 Enterprise Edition
> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/isa/2004/deploy/dgisaserver.mspx
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
.
- References:
- ISA2004 blocks Google desktop?
- From: Gavin - MCSE2K
- RE: ISA2004 blocks Google desktop?
- From: lforbes
- ISA2004 blocks Google desktop?
- Prev by Date: Re: DNS issue
- Next by Date: Re: ISA2004 blocks Google desktop?
- Previous by thread: RE: ISA2004 blocks Google desktop?
- Next by thread: Re: ISA2004 blocks Google desktop?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|