Re: SMTP Filter, blocking inbound spoof addresses
- From: "ncudmore" <ncudmore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 14:40:03 -0700
Umm, looks like you're getting the wrong end of the stick here.
First off the hope was that the ISA's addin SMTP filter could actually
filter SMTP traffic for a listed domain(s), OK it seems it can't do it, maybe
on the wish list for a future version. After all the idea of a configurable
software firewall is the addins can be used to do these sorts of jobs,
otherwise I'd go back to a PIX!
So, I suggested sticking a mail server in the DMZ which only accepts the
vaild inbound addressed e-mail, i.e. whatever@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx and rejecting
e-mail not addressed to the domainname.net. This will cut down the LAN
traffic and traffic thru the ISA server since only mail address to people in
my domain will be passed on, with the server in the dmz rejecting mail not
for users here.
Adding reverse DNS checks to inbound e-mail for e-mail addressed to valid
users will be nominal after rejecting e-mail which isn't addressed to users
in the domain. 85%+ of mail coming thru the ISA server at present isn't for
a valid address here and is attempted relay by spammers. By using a Domino
server (or other mailserver) I can use a lookup on the NAB (native Domino) or
LDAP check for valid addresses, before passing mail to the ISA server for the
final pass on to the inside and the mailserver, thus dropping e-mail and not
rejecting which is valid domain but not for a valid user (saves on phishing).
Reverse DNS checks on inbound e-mail won't add too much load to the internet
connection, since most cases the same domains contact us, so the DNS will be
cached, most people average a TTL on their MX records of between 60 min and 1
week, so even with 300 domains sending us e-mail a day (we get only around
100 - 300 valid e-mails aday) that's less than 13 reverse DNS checks a hour
on max on an empty cache and no e-mails from the same domains, hardly a
massive amount, and less traffic that we currently get from spammers, which
is 4-5 e-mails a minute. Mind you if everyone set a TTL of 600 sec on domain
mx records, yes this would push the bandwidth.
Neil [MCSE and Dual CLP]
"Phillip Windell" wrote:
> "ncudmore" <ncudmore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:FB84C7D2-098F-4C9C-AEB5-92F8071C169D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Well guess I wanted a simple check for inbound mail, on a valid inbound
> > domain address in the to, cc, bcc fields for mail addressed to users, and
> if
> > there wasn't a valid address in these fields to reject it at ISA level.
> >
> > Figure now the answer is to build a mailserver into the DMZ, outside the
> > existing ISA server, and behind the external hardware firewall, and get it
> to
> > check this, then, relay valid mail thru the ISA server, and drop mail from
> > people attempting to use it as an open relay.
>
> No. You only need a Spam Filtering System to do that not a real mail
> server. But *be warned*, checking for proper lookup of the sending Domain
> will create a *ton* of false positives depending on the "logic" used by the
> filtering software and will likely cause an overload of the Line due to the
> massive amount of DNS Queries made,....it isn't going to matter where you
> "stick" the machine (LAN, DMZ, External, Whatever).
>
> --
> Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
> www.wandtv.com
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Understanding the ISA 2004 Access Rule Processing
> http://www.isaserver.org/articles/ISA2004_AccessRules.html
>
> Microsoft Internet Security & Acceleration Server: Guidance
> http://www.microsoft.com/isaserver/techinfo/Guidance/2004.asp
> http://www.microsoft.com/isaserver/techinfo/Guidance/2000.asp
>
> Microsoft Internet Security & Acceleration Server: Partners
> http://www.microsoft.com/isaserver/partners/default.asp
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SMTP Filter, blocking inbound spoof addresses
- From: jiambor
- Re: SMTP Filter, blocking inbound spoof addresses
- References:
- SMTP Filter, blocking inbound spoof addresses
- From: ncudmore
- Re: SMTP Filter, blocking inbound spoof addresses
- From: ncudmore
- SMTP Filter, blocking inbound spoof addresses
- Prev by Date: Problems Displaying Web Pages
- Next by Date: RE: Problems Displaying Web Pages
- Previous by thread: Re: SMTP Filter, blocking inbound spoof addresses
- Next by thread: Re: SMTP Filter, blocking inbound spoof addresses
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|