Re: Windows Update v5 issues and workaround

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance

From: Phillip Windell (_at_.)
Date: 01/20/05

  • Next message: Chris: "Programs won't close after installing ISA Client"
    Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 18:07:28 -0600
    
    

    "Tom Bokman" <TomBokman@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
    news:E0C4351C-FE18-4B12-BC49-6011339DC1D2@microsoft.com...
    > Well, Phillip if you're so smart, then it should be easy for you explain
    why
    > it works for my secureNAT clients but not Web proxy clients. Just tell me
    > what I need to change to make it work for Web Proxy clients. I'm
    > listening!!!!!

    If it helps, I will re-create what the article says on my system
    tomorrow,...it is too late to mess with today for me. I run ISA2000
    only,..so that is all I can test with. I have no means to test with ISA2004
    but the principles are the same. The article mentioned earlier gives the
    process for both versions.

    I have users who are not allowed Internet Access at all, but this process
    would allow them to anonymously get to the Windows Update Sites while still
    denying them access to anywhere else on the Internet. This would verify
    that is works properly.

    All this boils down to is allowing Anonymous access to *certain* places on
    the Internet while forcing Authentication for everything else,..it would be
    done the same for any similar situation, not just Windows Update.

    Here are some things to check on your system in the meantime.......

    Right-click on the Servername of the ISA in the ISA MMC. Choose Properties,
    and choose Outgoing Web Requests. Disable the "Ask unauthenticated users
    for identification". Your Site and Content Rules and your Protocol Rules
    will *already* force authentication where you require it,...so you don't
    need to force it here.

    The "WU Protocol Rule" you created (that was mentioned in the article) would
    have the "Applies To:" set to "Any Request" But your other Protocol Rules
    will still authenticate as you are already doing.

    The WU Site & Content Rule that uses the Windows Update Destination Set
    (described in the article) would have the "Applies To:" set to "Any
    request". But your other S&C Rules will still authenticate as you are
    already doing.

    You have to verify that you created all the Rules exactly as the article
    describes and did not deviate from it or leave any detail out. I cannot see
    your rules from here and I cannot verify from here if you have any other
    rules that may be causing a conflict of some sort. I also can not verify
    from here if your clients are properly configured as Web Clients, Firewall
    Clients, or SecureNat Clients,...only you can verify that.

    Here is the article's link again,..

    Troubleshooting Windows Update v.5 Authentication Issue
    http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/winxppro/support/updateauthen.mspx

    -- 
    Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
    www.wandtv.com
    

  • Next message: Chris: "Programs won't close after installing ISA Client"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Windows Update v5 issues and workaround
      ... > it works for my secureNAT clients but not Web proxy clients. ... the Internet while forcing Authentication for everything else,..it would be ... done the same for any similar situation, not just Windows Update. ... You have to verify that you created all the Rules exactly as the article ...
      (microsoft.public.isa.configuration)
    • Re: Windows Update v5 issues and workaround
      ... > it works for my secureNAT clients but not Web proxy clients. ... the Internet while forcing Authentication for everything else,..it would be ... done the same for any similar situation, not just Windows Update. ... You have to verify that you created all the Rules exactly as the article ...
      (microsoft.public.isa)
    • Re: pine program and mail services with FC6 System
      ... protocols = imap imaps pop3 pop3s ... # Directory where authentication process places authentication UNIX sockets ... # chroot login process to the login_dir. ... # what most of your IMAP clients are. ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: Remote site BDCs wont auth clients when T1 to AD 2003 is down LTLM?
      ... Depending on what clients you have if you do not have additional W2K DCs ... Put a W2K DC at every site the you want authentication to continue if the ... 298713 How to Prevent Overloading on the First Domain Controller During ... I have tried forcing the AD controller to do NTLM only- but that ...
      (microsoft.public.security)
    • Re: Remote site BDCs wont auth clients when T1 to AD 2003 is down LTLM?
      ... Depending on what clients you have if you do not have additional W2K DCs ... Put a W2K DC at every site the you want authentication to continue if the ... 298713 How to Prevent Overloading on the First Domain Controller During ... I have tried forcing the AD controller to do NTLM only- but that ...
      (microsoft.public.win2000.security)