Re: Windows Update v5 issues and workaround
From: Phillip Windell (_at_.)
Date: 01/19/05
- Next message: Phillip Windell: "Re: Windows Update v5 issues and workaround"
- Previous message: Phillip Windell: "Re: Windows Update v5 issues and workaround"
- In reply to: Mediator: "Re: Windows Update v5 issues and workaround"
- Next in thread: Tom Bokman: "Re: Windows Update v5 issues and workaround"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 17:09:55 -0600
Yes. That is correct,...if it is ISA2004,...ISA 2000 does not work that way.
They changed that behavor in 2004 because the "ordered" method of 2004 is
more flexable.
-- Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA] www.wandtv.com "Mediator" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:%23cu91Mj$EHA.612@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > One more point; in addition to the DESTINATION SET, it is also important to > keep in mind the ORDER IN WHICH RULES GET APPLIED. So the rule for the > Destination Set of Windows Update should be applied first, giving everyone > anonymous access to only the sites specified in destination set; next (lower > in order) should be the rule for allowing access for the rest of the web to > the group that you specify.
- Next message: Phillip Windell: "Re: Windows Update v5 issues and workaround"
- Previous message: Phillip Windell: "Re: Windows Update v5 issues and workaround"
- In reply to: Mediator: "Re: Windows Update v5 issues and workaround"
- Next in thread: Tom Bokman: "Re: Windows Update v5 issues and workaround"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
