Re: still waiting for the book to fix this
From: Jim Harrison [MSFT] (jmharr_at_online.microsoft.com)
Date: 11/05/04
- Previous message: Netsam Matt: "ISA and Frontpage"
- In reply to: menard: "still waiting for the book to fix this"
- Next in thread: menard: "Re: still waiting for the book to fix this"
- Reply: menard: "Re: still waiting for the book to fix this"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 10:33:11 -0800
Without a detailed list of your existing rules, it's impossible to say why ISA chooses to drop that traffic.
It's clear that ISA considers the traffic to fall outside of the defined rules, though.
--
Jim Harrison [ISASE]
Read the help, books and articles!
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"menard" <menard@stanleyaviation.not> wrote in message news:Oya8tpuwEHA.4004@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
i have 2 satalites who connect to our 'home'.
home is isa 2000,
one satalite is isa 2000
the new 'test' satalite is isa 2004
the difference is that the test site, can't do telnet port 23 to the legacy
server.
the other isa 2000 satalite can do telnet on port 23 with no problem
the isa 2004 has log items that say :
log time destination ip dest port protocol action rule client ip
client user source net dest net
<date> 172.30.32.51 23 telnet denied connectoin default rule
172.31.31.8 denver\administrator internal <demand dial interface
i've put the 'telnet' protocal in a couple of the rules i've set up, but the
system seems hard wired to deny telnet
this is a show stopper for our updating to isa 2004
is the answer in the book whcich i won't get till december?
mike
- Previous message: Netsam Matt: "ISA and Frontpage"
- In reply to: menard: "still waiting for the book to fix this"
- Next in thread: menard: "Re: still waiting for the book to fix this"
- Reply: menard: "Re: still waiting for the book to fix this"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
