Re: DirectX 9.0b on Server 2003
From: Kevin Christian [MS] (kevc_at_online.microsoft.com)
Date: 02/21/04
- Next message: Ian: "Rise of Nations"
- Previous message: Kevin Christian [MS]: "Re: port problem"
- In reply to: Nony Buz: "Re: DirectX 9.0b on Server 2003"
- Next in thread: Indiana: "Re: DirectX 9.0b on Server 2003"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:24:11 -0800
3d acceleration is disabled by default on Server 2003. You'll need to turn
it to full.
Right click desktop, properties, settings, advanced, troubleshoot tab
-- Kevin Christian [MS] This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. "Nony Buz" <noya@dwtty.com> wrote in message news:mfyZb.3600$6t5.555@fe3.columbus.rr.com... > > "Nony Buz" <noya@dwtty.com> wrote in message > >| A G-force FX5200 was just installed into a Windows 2003 Server. The > >| drivers where installed and then DirectX 9.0b was install. When running > >| the DirectX Diagnostic Tool it states that Direct3D Acceleration and AGP > >| Texture Acceleration are not avaiable. In the notes it says: > >| > >| The file nv4_disp.dll is not digitally signed, which means that > >| it has not been tested by Microsoft's Windows Hardware Quality > >| Labs (WHQL). You may be able to get a WHQL logo'd driver from > >| the hardware manufacturer. > >| > >| The latest drivers where downloaded and installed from NVidia, but the > >| problem remains. What must be done to get both Direct3D Acceleration > >| and AGP Texture Acceleration to become available? > > On Sat, 21 Feb 2004 at 00:17 GMT, Jimmy S. <> wrote: > > > Sounds like you need to update your chipset drivers. It's normal for > > the latest drivers from nVidia to not be signed yet. They update them > > faster than the labs can test them. :-) If it's of any assurance to > > you, I use un- signed drivers for my nVidia card as well. How to > > update your Chipset Drivers: > > http://www3.sympatico.ca/nibblesnbits/Video.html#v11 > > I am sorry to say, but it was not the answer. One of the first things > done after installing Server 2003 was a Motherboard Chip upgrade. Any > more thoughts?
- Next message: Ian: "Rise of Nations"
- Previous message: Kevin Christian [MS]: "Re: port problem"
- In reply to: Nony Buz: "Re: DirectX 9.0b on Server 2003"
- Next in thread: Indiana: "Re: DirectX 9.0b on Server 2003"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|