Re: Printing pages from web sites.

Geoff wrote:
There must be some way though, It should be possible, it is certainly
desirable to be able to prevent copying. At present there are web
publishers who might like to provide the super quality that they have
captured as photographs or that are scans of paintings but are
inhibited to do so because people can download them to print on their
own printer rather than pay for the photo from the website. The
argument is discussed on http://photography-on-the.net/forum/
showthread.php?t=29833

I have thought of using digimarc, at least to protect copyright. The
full service will trace images that are republished as well. The
problem is that it is very expensive, requires an annual subscription,
and can only be considered by a succesfull professional photographer
or artist or a web hosting service that publishes high quality work.

I have Watermark Factory that can be used to add a lot of information
to your images but doesn't trace unauthorised republishing.


On 28 Jan, 15:34, "DanR" <d...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
L Covey wrote:
There are ways to get around that, though.Alt Print Screen will
capture current window to the clip board. Any image
editor can then open that image and user can crop out all but the
picture and do what ever with it.

The method I described will only capture what can be displayed on the screen
at a given time. Therefore the person copying is limited by the resolution
of their display. If their display is 1280x1024 for example... and your
picture is of a greater resolution than that... then the copycat can not
capture your picture at its native resolution. But... they could capture the
high res picture in segments and paste it together. Another but... but why
would someone post a picture at a higher resolution than most people could
display.
.... I seem to be debating myself...


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Freecom DVB-T USB thingy questions...
    ... I was under the impression that to capture broadcast mpeg2 directly, ... A longish but detailed explanation of why capturing broadcast mpeg2 from a true DTT card is different to capturing other streams. ... An analogue tv capture will need 2 Ghz or more to compress to mpeg2 because once the stream reaches the computer it already is "a picture" and "a sound" - even if it was originally an mpeg2 data stream e.g a picture decoded from a dvd player or digital tv stb. ...
    (uk.tech.digital-tv)
  • Re: Image Processing with Geode GX2: Win CE or XPe?
    ... Few facts if you use color picture: If you use 2 bytes per pixel then you will have following memory bandwidth ... 1280x960x2x60> 140.65 MB/s for bringing RAW video over PCI-? ... Just for picture capture to memory you lost 140+ MB of bandwidth. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.embedded)
  • Re: What does this NULL mean?
    ... >>>under one theoretical umbrella. ... > Yet this is just one of two big picture views of that whole. ... > The other one is capture - data - presentation. ... components of software applications/solutions. ...
    (comp.databases.theory)
  • Re: Setting video type and output resolution in DirectShow
    ... > December 2002) to capture still images without using the ... > SampleGrabber. ... It comes up by default with 320x240 resolution, ...
    (microsoft.public.win32.programmer.directx.video)
  • Re: damn red xs again
    ... > The first time I tried I saw a Red-X for the counter. ... > So I guess there was some kind of timeout happening. ... > need to capture by turning off Show Pictures (Options, Advanced, ... Show Picture could serve as a workaround for you? ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6.browser)
Loading