Re: Stupid stupid change in Frontpage

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance



MusicMan <musicman@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:kub422927u2qo8bhq2m2b8cl0jtgm1tlip@xxxxxxx:

Dude. I copy and paste every day. FP2003.
Chill.


OK.

You CAN paste into the link box. No, you cannot use the right click
menu, like you are probably used to doing, and there are several good
reasons why. I won't go into them here.

To paste a link, copy it, put the cursor in the link box in FP2003, and
hit CTRL-V. It is the standard paste key combination for all Windows
machines. The entire list of keyboard shortcuts can be found at:


OK, I can paste, but CTRL-V is hardly intuitive, and it is a change from
previous versions. I have other programs that won't let you right click,
but you can go to "edit" and manually paste. I'm glad I can cut and
paste, and I thank you for the info, but my complaint stands.

And in addition to what others have already stated...

If you have a website or URL from the web that you want to link to,
highlight the text on your page where you want to add the link....open
your browser (I use IE) to the page you want to link to (or have it
already opened)....then go back to FP and click on the "create link"
button ....when the dialogue box opens, click back to your browser,
then back to FP and the URL that you have open in the browser will
appear in the dialogue box (like magic)....Click save/okay and you're
done.

Now this is cool, thank you.

Thanks for the info. I appoligize for the rant but this it is
frustrating to get held up by such a simple thing, and the problem is
caused by attempts to automate simple tasks. One thing it is to add
features, but when you take features away and completely replace them
with supposed automation... For instance, it's actually gotten more
difficult to highlight text in Word because the program tries guess what
you are going to highlight rather than just let you do it.

By the way, I realize this is a newgroups and I'm not actually talking to
MS here.

Paul
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Cross-Browser onmousedown JavaScript
    ... It would only make sense to implement the W3C events model if there is a demand for currently unused event features; and if this were happening, nothing would prevent Microsoft from extending the current model, rather than implementing the W3C's model. ... Given this situation, two solutions are available: either change/correct the scripts, or change/evolve the browser's model. ... The choice of changing the model looks like the less painful; after all, scripts do not need to updated, and the browser ends up with more capabilities, right? ...
    (comp.lang.javascript)
  • Re: How can I read html data of other site (with javascript or etc)?
    ... target browsers. ... available features of a browser in order to gain new features, ... properties of host objects, but you also try to augment host objects with ... target only one specific browser brand instead of *at least* one DOM ...
    (comp.lang.javascript)
  • Re: How can I read html data of other site (with javascript or etc)?
    ... target browsers. ... available features of a browser in order to gain new features, ... properties of host objects, but you also try to augment host objects with ... target only one specific browser brand instead of *at least* one DOM ...
    (comp.lang.javascript)
  • Re: How can I read html data of other site (with javascript or etc)?
    ... target browsers. ... available features of a browser in order to gain new features, ... 7+ for Windows 2000, and Windows XP, Windows Vista, or Windows 7 would not ... target only one specific browser brand instead of *at least* one DOM ...
    (comp.lang.javascript)
  • Re: A more rational approach to Browsers - Microsoft please read this
    ... Setting security in IE is a lot closer to ALL or NONE than it should be. ... The mechanism does not allow the degree of control which the Internet ... Every new feature has the potential to interact with existing features. ... > We do need a secure browser, but that can be done with one browser, and is ...
    (microsoft.public.security)