Re: Front Page 2000 does NOT allow multiple <body> tags, Whgy not?

Tech-Archive recommends: Fix windows errors by optimizing your registry

Your inane answer is unacceptable. If the product is incapable of doing this
then I'll just go purchase something else that can.

Think out of the box sometime, it may help you advance a little quicker. It
was a simple question that (if you knew anything about the product) you could
have answered with a simple question instead of being buligerant.

I'm sorry that the Cafeteria by you ran out of starbucks but it is no reason
to be insultling.

Now go back in your cube and think about it and let the adults discuss this
issue.

"Kevin Spencer" wrote:

> 1992 was a long time ago. I do know the answer. You don't accept it.
>
> I have been programming since 1992. But I certainly don't program the way I
> did back then!
>
> Now, there must be some reason or requirement that you want to fulfill, that
> you THINK requires having more than one body tag in the page. But what you
> want to accomplish by this incorrect method can certainly be accomplished
> with correct/valid HTML. Why don't you tell us what you're trying to achieve
> in the wrong way, and we can tell you how to achieve it in the right way?
>
> --
> HTH,
>
> Kevin Spencer
> Microsoft MVP
> ..Net Developer
> Ambiguity has a certain quality to it.
>
> "DAWG" <DAWG@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:A7678C7D-DF5F-4FDD-B2AA-0D59C454A51C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > If you don't know the answer then Please don't reply. There ARE Reasons
> > for
> > this, and Other HTML Products allow it. I have been coding html since
> > 1992. I
> > could do this by Raw coding but then what would be the sence of having
> > Frontpage.
> >
> >
> >
> > "Kevin Spencer" wrote:
> >
> >> That would be because FrontPage knows all about HTML, and you apparently
> >> do
> >> not. It is not valid to have more than one body tag in a page, nor does
> >> it
> >> serve any useful purpose, as the body tag is there for your browser's
> >> benefit, not yours, and is invisible to you, unless you are viewing the
> >> source code of the page, in which case it is simply text that doesn't
> >> belong
> >> there more than once.
> >>
> >> --
> >> HTH,
> >>
> >> Kevin Spencer
> >> Microsoft MVP
> >> ..Net Developer
> >> Ambiguity has a certain quality to it.
> >>
> >> "DAWG" <DAWG@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >> news:D500C0C9-6EC8-495A-A7F4-6321490BE1C5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >I am trying to have multiplr <body> tags but Front page2000 keeps
> >> >erasing
> >> >all
> >> > but the first one.
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Custom Server Control Nightmare
    ... Funny thing is that I have used a simple HTML Button: ... It still posts back for some reason. ... "Kevin Spencer" wrote: ... >> don't need a postback or round trip to the server. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet)
  • Re: Response.write in UserCOntrol
    ... "Kevin Spencer" wrote in message ... > All HTML in an ASP.Net page is objects on the server at runtime (yes, ... > For this reason, a Page is populated by creating objects and placing them ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet)
  • Re: Front Page 2000 does NOT allow multiple tags, Whgy not?
    ... I have been coding html since 1992. ... "Kevin Spencer" wrote: ... It is not valid to have more than one body tag in a page, ...
    (microsoft.public.frontpage.programming)
  • Re: HTML4.01 STRICT and hyperlinks with target
    ... new window *in HTML* instead of in JavaScript. ... have a link open a new window in HTML instead of in JavaScript. ... I know this is not a great reason, but I think it is reason ...
    (comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html)
  • Re: Recommended IMAP server
    ... Is there be any particular reason I should swap? ... pop3 mailboxes and passing it on to the imap server. ... > Trying to strip the HTML mail is quite a bit of a mess. ... tend to be much more attached to email clients. ...
    (comp.os.linux.networking)