Re: asp or aspx with FP 2003

From: Ted (ted.ljong_at_albatross.nu)
Date: 10/20/04 

Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 23:48:01 +0200

Thanks for your answer Kevin
The fact that FP 2003 not support update and delete of records in an
accessdb when I use asp is a problem. I have read MS articel how to work
around this problem with some writing in the aspcode. But, I donīt like that
soloution because when I edit the dbresult I have to do the handcoding all
over again.Do you know a better way to solve this problem or do I have to
either use both FP 2000 and FP 2003 or, if I only use FP 2003 do the coding
every time I edit the DBresult.

This problem is the reason why I am looking at aspx. I thougt that maybe
this is the way to do it today and I donīt want to rebuild the site because
of using old components. So what do you think is there a chance that MS will
fix this problem in FP 2003 or is it better to learn how to use aspx if I
dont want to have those problems I described above.

I appreciate if you could give me your opinion about this
Ted

"Kevin Spencer" <kspencer@takempis.com> skrev i meddelandet
news:uQ64HXutEHA.272@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Hi Ted,
>
> It really doesn't matter which one you use. ASP.Net is more powerful than
> ASP, but not with regards to the simple kind of functionality you would
> get
> from a FrontPage component. ASP.Net is also more complex, and if you ever
> need to tweak your code, it would be more difficult without any
> experience.
>
> --
> HTH,
> Kevin Spencer
> .Net Developer
> Microsoft MVP
> I get paid good money to
> solve puzzles for a living
>
> "Ted" <ted.ljong@albatross.nu> wrote in message
> news:#AelkFutEHA.2804@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
>> I have been running FP 2000 several years now and I have used FP DRW for
>> connetion to databases and this have worked without any problems. After I
>> made an upgrade to FP 2003 there is a problem to create forms for
>> updating
>> and deleting records in databases, so for those pages I still Use FP
>> 2000.
>>
>> I am now planning to make a new site, and my question is. Is it better to
>> use aspnet (aspx) insead of asp ? I have tried a little to use aspnet
>> with
>> FP 2003 but I canīt figure out how to use it for databaseresults as I
>> have
>> done in asp. For example: I canīt use forms in the same page as aspx, or
> am
>> I wrong, how do I post a databaseresult to other pages. Is it possible to
>> use FP with aspx to achieve this or do I have to make my own code for
> this,
>> Iīm not a programmer so I have been very happy with my FP that have
>> solved
>> all my problems, with FP 2003 I'm not so happy.
>>
>> I hope someone could give me a hint where to read about working with
> aspnet
>> using FP and maybe answer some of my aspxnewbiequestions above.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Ted
>>
>>
>
>

Relevant Pages

  • Re: asp or aspx with FP 2003
    ... ASP, but not with regards to the simple kind of functionality you would get ... > and deleting records in databases, so for those pages I still Use FP 2000. ... > use aspnet (aspx) insead of asp? ...
    (microsoft.public.frontpage.programming)
  • asp or aspx with FP 2003
    ... and deleting records in databases, so for those pages I still Use FP 2000. ... use aspnet insead of asp? ... done in asp. ... I canīt use forms in the same page as aspx, ...
    (microsoft.public.frontpage.programming)
  • Re: Event handler for a client side OWC component
    ... You do the same thing in aspx as you do in asp ... > possible because a client object cannot fire server side code. ...
    (microsoft.public.office.developer.web.components)
  • Re: Securing Non ASP.Net Files
    ... For both ASP and ASPX pages there are two activities which you might wish to ... In order to ensure that scripts may not be downloaded, ... above and beyond the way IIS will natively treat ASP ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.security)
  • Re: ASP.NET
    ... The results of your asp page should be the same as your aspx. ... Using the code in a kind of Scripting way inside the HTML code not ... If you use it in the first two ways, than your newsgroup is mostly as ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.general)