Re: Poor Webmaster Personal Sites
From: Bob Lehmann (nospam_at_dontbotherme.zzz)
Date: 03/20/05
- Next message: Bob Lehmann: "Re: Poor Webmaster Personal Sites"
- Previous message: Gerry for email use my name at dergal dt com: "Re: Poor Webmaster Personal Sites"
- In reply to: Steve Sobol: "Re: Poor Webmaster Personal Sites"
- Next in thread: Steve Sobol: "Re: Poor Webmaster Personal Sites"
- Reply: Steve Sobol: "Re: Poor Webmaster Personal Sites"
- Reply: Steve Easton: "Re: Poor Webmaster Personal Sites"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 15:10:41 -0700
> You bet FP could be used to recreate amazon.com? Just FP, with no
programming on the backend? I'll take that bet any day.
See, now you're qualifying what you said earlier - typical alt.* tactics. I
couldn't recreate my own dopey site, with any program, without doing backend
programming. You're such a dumbass.
FP could do the programming on the backend - ASP, PHP, PERL. But, if you are
talking about Database creation and management, Compiled binary Services
(dlls), used by the web app and other such periphery, then *NO* program can,
or should, beable to do that.
Do you know of any program that *could* create amazon.com, all on its own,
without any backend programming?
God, you're stupid! Are you some kind of Sales & Marketing 'tard?
Bob Lehmann
"Steve Sobol" <sjsobol@JustThe.net> wrote in message
news:d1kohe$vlt$1@ratbert.glorb.com...
> Bob Lehmann wrote:
> >>Websites are software... Computer programs.
> >
> > Web pages that consist of nothing but HTML are not programs. That's like
> > calling a letter you wrote in a Word Processor a program.
>
> Web pages containing any kind of active scripting or with any kind of
> programming on the backend are what I'm referring to. You're right; if
it's
> exclusively HTML, it's just text with markup. But add Javascript, Flash,
or
> generate the code dynamically using a scripting or programming language...
then
> programming is involved :) (with Flash, I'd go further and say you have to
have
> some programming logic involved to consider it having been programmed, but
you
> get the idea)
>
> > If it was static, then it wouldn't be dynamic, now would it? But, I bet
FP
> > could be used to recreate amazon.com.
>
> You bet FP could be used to recreate amazon.com? Just FP, with no
programming
> on the backend? I'll take that bet any day.
>
> >>forever - you should freshen it up on a regular basis
> >
> > What does that have to do with it being error free?
>
> I was responding to the implication that it's ok to let the site just sit
there
> and never do anything with it.
>
> --
> JustThe.net - Apple Valley, CA - http://JustThe.net/ - 888.480.4NET (4638)
> Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / sjsobol@JustThe.net / PGP: 0xE3AE35ED
>
> "The wisdom of a fool won't set you free"
> --New Order, "Bizarre Love Triangle"
- Next message: Bob Lehmann: "Re: Poor Webmaster Personal Sites"
- Previous message: Gerry for email use my name at dergal dt com: "Re: Poor Webmaster Personal Sites"
- In reply to: Steve Sobol: "Re: Poor Webmaster Personal Sites"
- Next in thread: Steve Sobol: "Re: Poor Webmaster Personal Sites"
- Reply: Steve Sobol: "Re: Poor Webmaster Personal Sites"
- Reply: Steve Easton: "Re: Poor Webmaster Personal Sites"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|