Re: Use FP 2003 on a site developed with other software?
From: Serious_Practitioner (Serious_PractitionerNOSPAM_at_att.net)
Date: 01/18/05
- Next message: Murray: "Re: Use FP 2003 on a site developed with other software?"
- Previous message: Grant: "Discussion Groups Auto-Fill POSTER"
- In reply to: Murray: "Re: Use FP 2003 on a site developed with other software?"
- Next in thread: Murray: "Re: Use FP 2003 on a site developed with other software?"
- Reply: Murray: "Re: Use FP 2003 on a site developed with other software?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:37:01 GMT
Hi, Murray, and many thanks for your informative reply.
I thought that some of the HTML on the newer pages looked sort of, um,
exotic, but I don't really have the experience to make that judgement. And
I'm less worried about conflicts - I know they will occur, but hopefully not
horrible ones.
I do have a question about one sentence in your reply. You say that a good
coder can use FP and produce a page that is authoring system agnostic. I'm
probably not that good, but I learn fast...where can I get some pointers on
how to do that, or is this truly one of the trial-and-error things?
Again, thanks.
Steve E.
"Murray" <forums@HAHAgreat-web-sights.com> wrote in message
news:uFQ1aoP$EHA.2012@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> Net Object Fusion creates the most grotesque HTML I have ever seen. Be
> prepared. If you do NOT know HTML then you are in for a treat.
>
> A Dreamweaver page should be a piece of cake for you to bring into FP. Its
> code is clean and tidy (mostly). The one thing to be aware of is this -
if
> the pages are under control of a Dreamweaver template, and if that
template
> was created using Dreamweaver MX or Dreamweaver MX2004, then you are in
> trouble, since FP cannot understand DMX/DMX2004 template markup.
>
> I hope that nobody in the current round of 'ownership' will be using
> anything other than FP to maintain this site - that's where other troubles
> will arise, too - two simultaneous editors using different authoring
> products.
>
> > 3. If I use FP, how likely is it that the next person will have problems
> > using a different product?
>
> It would entirely depend on how good you are. A good coder can use FP in
> such a way that the page is nearly authoring system agnostic.
>
> --
> Murray
>
> "Serious_Practitioner" <Serious_PractitionerNOSPAM@att.net> wrote in
message
> news:BpXGd.18217$S11.11467@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> > Hello, all, and thank you in advance for your assistance and opinions.
> >
> > I may have to begin taking a fairly active part in the management of a
> > small
> > Web site. I just recently acquired a copy of FP 2003, and I have a
couple
> > of
> > questions that I'd like to ask before I break something! I know enough
> > about
> > this to believe that the site is fairly simple, having made small
changes
> > to
> > the site with text editors and the like, but I'm concerned about a
couple
> > of
> > things.
> >
> > 1. The site has been developed and/or maintained using Dreamweaver,
> > primarily. Currently, the fellow who is doing
> > the work is using NetObjects Top Page, by IBM. The question that
comes
> > to my mind is - what conflicts might or
> > will be caused by my beginning to use FP 2003?
> > 2. If one creates or changes a page with FP, in these circumstances, is
it
> > necessary to republish the entire site, or can
> > one page simply be moved to the server? I detect some differing
> > information about that in one of the other newsgroups.
> > 3. If I use FP, how likely is it that the next person will have problems
> > using a different product?
> >
> > I'm certainly interested in other comments, cautions and information as
> > well. Thank you again.
> >
> >
> > Steve E.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
- Next message: Murray: "Re: Use FP 2003 on a site developed with other software?"
- Previous message: Grant: "Discussion Groups Auto-Fill POSTER"
- In reply to: Murray: "Re: Use FP 2003 on a site developed with other software?"
- Next in thread: Murray: "Re: Use FP 2003 on a site developed with other software?"
- Reply: Murray: "Re: Use FP 2003 on a site developed with other software?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
