Re: -> NOT FOR RETAIL OR OEM DISTRIBUTION <- ???
From: Murray (forums_at_HAHAgreat-web-sights.com)
Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 20:15:11 -0500
> By the way, FP is best for photo based websites over Dreamweaver, (such as
> photography) thus I use both programs based on the needs of a given
This would only be the case if you wanted to use something canned....
You can build an awesome photo gallery in either program if you know the
gnits and gnats, doncha know?
-- Murray "- (James)" <email@example.com> wrote in message news:XwZBd.firstname.lastname@example.org... > By the way, FP is best for photo based websites over Dreamweaver, (such as > photography) thus I use both programs based on the needs of a given > website. > > Here is what Yahoo.com states: > > Which FrontPage components does Yahoo! support? > Yahoo! supports server extensions for FrontPage 2002 only (these > extensions > are compatible with FrontPage 2000). You may use FrontPage 2003 with your > Web Hosting account; however, you will be able to access only those > features > compatible with FrontPage 2002. > > The following FrontPage 2002 components will work with your web site: > > substitution > hit counter > marquee > hover button > include page > scheduled picture > table of content > time stamp > theme > > Please note that Yahoo! does not support the search form extension. > > > ___________________ > > > Which versions of FrontPage does Yahoo! support? > Yahoo! supports FrontPage 2000, FrontPage 2002, and the FrontPage 2003 > features that can be supported by the Microsoft FrontPage 2002 server > extensions. > > See which features of FrontPage 2003 are supported below. > > Feature With Server Extensions for FrontPage 2002 > Date / Time > Yes > > Comment > Yes > > Photo Gallery > Yes > > Substitution > Yes > > Include > Yes > > Themes > Yes > > External Web > Yes > > Navigation > Yes > > Page Banner > Yes > > Link Bar, Custom > Yes > > Link Bar, Back/Next > Yes > > Top 10 Lists > Yes > > Save Form Results (Email, File) > Yes > > Reports > Yes > > Search Form and Table of Contents options for various template wizards > Yes > > User Registration template > Yes > > Database Results > Yes > > Save Results to Database > Yes > > Search Current Web > Yes > > Hit Counter > Yes > > Include Page Based on Schedule > Yes > > Include Picture Based on Schedule > Yes > > Table of Contents > Yes > > Visual InterDev Navigation Bar > Yes > > Table of Contents template > Yes > > Lists > No > > Document libraries > No > > Discussion > No > > Survey > No > > Modify rules for document libraries > No > > Rules customization in the Document Libraries Wizard > No > > Data Source Catalog task pane > No > > Data View Details task pane > No > > Data View Conditional Formatting > No > > Web Part Gallery task pane > No > > Data Source Catalog > No > > XML Support > No > > Web Packages > No > > Export & Import Web Packages > No > > Customize data views > No > > Data Source Details view > No > > Data View Web Part > No > > Data View styles > No > > Web Parts pages and zones > No > > Remote Web Site view > Yes > > Connect to remote sites > Yes > > Publish to FTP > Yes > > > ____________________________________ > > > > > > > > > > > > "Rob Giordano (Crash Gordon®)" <NOVIAGRAwebmaster@siriussystems.com> wrote > in message news:O9VW38P8EHA.email@example.com... > Yah but it doesn't mean 03 wont work if they were running the latest 02 > extensions...they just don't have the brain-space to "support" it. > Actually, > they didn't do much supporting of anything when I was on their system > thats > why I left. > > :-) > > > "Wes" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in message > news:e6NsXfJ8EHA.2788@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... > | Yahoo states they don't support 2003, meaning they will not answer any > | questions or help with any problems if you're using 2003. Kinda > silly...one > | would think a company of that magnitude would be more open brained. > | > | "Rob Giordano (Crash Gordon®)" <NOVIAGRAwebmaster@siriussystems.com> > wrote > | in message news:%23q$c9SJ8EHA.2124@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... > | FP2002 & 2003 both use the same extensions, so unless Yoohoo is using > really > | old extensions dunno. When I was with them last april they had the most > | current extension on my server. > | > | OEM...Original Equipment Manufacturerrrr. You've got a copy that is > | generally installed with new computers...like when you buy one already > | assembled with OS installed. Should work unless its a rotten bootleg. > | > | Try to install it. > | > | I still think Yoohoo is pullin' your chain though. > | > | > | "- (James)" <email@example.com> wrote in message > | news:_bMBd.6676$JC2.firstname.lastname@example.org... > | | > | | Hello, > | | > | | After extensive research reading groups and web based info, I still > have > | not > | | been able to find a concise answer to the following concern. > | | > | | I bought FrontPage 2002 (for a $100.00) from what appeared to be a > | | respectable website for an outdated copy of Front Page. I bought the > older > | | version of FrontPage because Yahoo.com web hosting services does not > fully > | | support versions newer than that I have FrontPage 2003 and it will not > | work > | | properly with Yahoo.com web hosting services. > | | > | | However, all I got was a disk in an unsealed sleeve (no CD Case) with > an > | | official looking product key taped to the sleeve. > | | > | | > | | > | | The gold disc reads: > | | > | | > | | FULFILLMENT DISTRIBUTION (C) 2001 > | | > | | UNLICENSED SOFTWARE > | | ILLEGAL WITHOUT SEPARATE LICENSE FROM MICROSOFT > | | > | | VERSION 2002 > | | 0301 PART NO. X06-22271 > | | > | | The part number is not found anywhere on the web when I last checked. > | | > | | I have NOT installed it yet and I'm not sure I should at all. And what > is > | | OEM? > | | > | | Any solid help (even Microsoft links) would be wonderful. > | | > | | Thanks in advance! > | | > | | James > | | > | | > | > | > >