Re: web development tools-Dreamweaver vs. Frontpage 2003
From: Kevin Spencer (kspencer_at_takempis.com)
Date: 11/12/04
- Next message: Peter: "Re: What are drawbacks to using Frames?"
- Previous message: Pipe: "FP Slideshow"
- In reply to: Stefan B Rusynko: "Re: web development tools-Dreamweaver vs. Frontpage 2003"
- Next in thread: Tina Clarke: "Re: web development tools-Dreamweaver vs. Frontpage 2003"
- Reply: Tina Clarke: "Re: web development tools-Dreamweaver vs. Frontpage 2003"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 11:35:09 -0500
> The single best feature in FP is site management
> - especially live online thru http
I've got to agfree with you there Stefan. There are quite a few software
packages for editing HTML. But FrontPage is probably the best in terms of
managing web sites.
-- HTH, Kevin Spencer .Net Developer Microsoft MVP Neither a follower nor a lender be. "Stefan B Rusynko" <sbr_enjoy@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:Oyt5$3MyEHA.3844@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... > The single best feature in FP is site management > - especially live online thru http > > Agree > The webbots are tools for those that don't know how to do it > - just as DW "tools" don't do anything an experienced developer can't do w/ notepad if needed > > -- > > _____________________________________________ > SBR @ ENJOY (-: [ Microsoft MVP - FrontPage ] > "Warning - Using the F1 Key will not break anything!" (-; > To find the best Newsgroup for FrontPage support see: > http://www.net-sites.com/sitebuilder/newsgroups.asp > _____________________________________________ > > > "Murray" <forums@HAHAgreat-web-sights.com> wrote in message news:%23LW1%23HMyEHA.3368@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... > | > There are things you can do in FrontPage that > | > you can't do in Dreamweaver, and vice versa. > | > | To be fair, I would say it this way - > | > | There are things that FP does "automatically", or via the intervention of > | some wizard, that must be done manually (or via the intervention of some 3rd > | party script) in Dreamweaver (examples would be guestbooks, form processing, > | slide shows, etc.). To be truthful, most of these things are things that > | *I* would want to do manually anyhow, but that's not really fair, because I > | *know* how to do them already. 8) Some of them are things that you can find > | 3rd party extensions for (a concept similar to the FP design-time > | extensions). > | > | In general, wizard code is fragile code, in my experience.... > | > | -- > | Murray > | > | "Kevin Spencer" <kspencer@takempis.com> wrote in message > | news:uqDM7$LyEHA.4004@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... > | >> If the outside developer spices up our > | >> web site with drop-down menus and mouse-over effects, will Frontpage > | >> still > | > be > | >> able edit the code created with Dreamweaver. > | > > | > It depends on what the code IS, and what the code DOES. If your site uses > | > a > | > lot of FrontPage proprietary components, esp. Themes, Shared Borders, > | > Naviagation, etc., you are pretty well stuck with FrontPage. On the other > | > hand, many FrontPage web sites don't use these proprietary conveniences, > | > and > | > can be worked on with virtually any toolset. > | > > | >> Are there any incompatiblity > | >> issues with a web page created by Dreamweaver and Frontpage edits. > | > > | > Same answer. > | > > | >>Our major > | >> concern is that the handful of resident web authors will need to be > | >> re-trained with Dreamweaver. My understanding is that Frontpage can do > | >> anything that Dreamweaver can. Is this correct? > | > > | > HTML is HTML. Some web components in FrontPage are proprietary, but > | > anything > | > that isn't can be manipulated in either program. As to FrontPage being > | > able > | > to do anything that Dreamweaver can do, well, again, we have to > | > differentiate between common HTML and things like proprietary components, > | > server-side programming, etc. There are things you can do in FrontPage > | > that > | > you can't do in Dreamweaver, and vice versa. But the bulk of a web site is > | > simply HTML. > | > > | > -- > | > HTH, > | > Kevin Spencer > | > .Net Developer > | > Microsoft MVP > | > Neither a follower > | > nor a lender be. > | > > | > "lkhntr" <lkhntr@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > | > news:D7E5EBE0-160C-41AB-AAD7-5B99A8C9C787@microsoft.com... > | >> Please advise on any difference between Macromedia Dreamweaver and > | > Microsoft > | >> Frontpage. We have a situation where an outside developer is wanting to > | > use > | >> Dreamweaver to spice up our website. If the outside developer spices up > | > our > | >> web site with drop-down menus and mouse-over effects, will Frontpage > | >> still > | > be > | >> able edit the code created with Dreamweaver. Are there any incompatiblity > | >> issues with a web page created by Dreamweaver and Frontpage edits. Our > | > major > | >> concern is that the handful of resident web authors will need to be > | >> re-trained with Dreamweaver. My understanding is that Frontpage can do > | >> anything that Dreamweaver can. Is this correct? > | > > | > > | > | > >
- Next message: Peter: "Re: What are drawbacks to using Frames?"
- Previous message: Pipe: "FP Slideshow"
- In reply to: Stefan B Rusynko: "Re: web development tools-Dreamweaver vs. Frontpage 2003"
- Next in thread: Tina Clarke: "Re: web development tools-Dreamweaver vs. Frontpage 2003"
- Reply: Tina Clarke: "Re: web development tools-Dreamweaver vs. Frontpage 2003"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Loading