Re: J-Bots Plus 2004 Release for FrontPage

Tech-Archive recommends: Fix windows errors by optimizing your registry

From: Watashee (watashee_at_one.net)
Date: 09/07/04 

Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 22:02:57 -0400

Brian, who cares. Only you for the most part. You waste as much bandwidth as
the next guy.

"Brian Mailman" <bmailman@sfo.invalid> wrote in message
news:10jmkpvfm2ntve3@news.supernews.com...
> Whatever, to be perfectly blunt about it you're talking about many
> things you have no idea what they mean. Like I said, these fora aren't
> for spam education, I've given you enough pointers for where to look.
>
> Ask in those places; your assumptions are completely faulty.
>
> B/
>
> MD Websunlimited wrote:
>
> > Brian,
> >
> > There is nothing fine print about it. It is apparent that you did not
view the page as it in fact italicized and in a different font
> > so that it stands out. It is directly below where the customer enters
their email address. Any reasonable person would consider
> > that consent.
> >
> > If our customers, which we have a transactional relationship with as
defined by the Can-Spam Act of 2003, have a problem with our
> > email one would assume that they would contact us. Nothing is hidden
about our identity in the emails, it contains our web site
> > address which contains email contact information, etc. It is sent with a
valid return address and there is no restriction on them
> > contacting us for removal if they so desire.
> >
> > IMHO, your making a mountain out of a mole hill. The email is sent only
to our customers and how our customers regard them is
> > between them and us. We've only had two requested removals out of the
tens of thousands we've sent. We've had more complaints about
> > not keeping them informed about new products etc. BTW, WU has been in
business since '98 and to the best of my recollection we've
> > only sent out three or four emails to our customers -- less than one a
year. This is hardly spam material..
> >
> > Our products our purchased by tens of thousands of customers and most
purchase the upgrades so they must be satisfied with the
> > products and the service we provide for them. Including emailing them
about new updates and upgrades.
> >
> > This entire spam email topic was started by an off-topic post by Jim
which I believe was done just to cause this type of turmoil and
> > false accusations. What you're doing is assisting him in this effort.
> >
> > This is my final response to this topic.

Quantcast