Re: Table Pixel Widths/Heights - better in FP 2003 ?
From: Steve Easton (admin_at_95isalive.com)
Date: 04/02/04
- Next message: Steve Easton: "Re: Need some help for this...."
- Previous message: BobA: "Re: site map sort order"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Bob: "Table Pixel Widths/Heights - better in FP 2003 ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 10:40:13 -0500
If you insert a table and then use the mouse to reposition / resize it, FP
including 2003 will always create a height attribute. It has to in order to
hold the dimension you have created.
The trick is to define your table widths using table properties.
-- Steve Easton Microsoft MVP FrontPage 95isalive This site is best viewed............ .......................with a computer "Bob" <uctraingNOSPAM@ultranet.com> wrote in message news:e81r60tcdttrldcqedtjefoi0l7mcp75k3@4ax.com... > Fixed pixel table questions: > > Does FP2003 handle the pixel adjustments on table cell widths better > than FP-XP and previous versions ? I build tables and use on screen > adjustment to rough in the appearance. FP-XP/2000 do some very strange > things with sizing and a table of 590 pixels often ends up with cells > that total over 1000 pixels. Have they fixed this issue ? > > Also, does FP2003 still put (those highly annoying) heights on tables > and cells at random times for no apparent reason ? I never use the > height adjustments in FP but I often end up with cells and tables that > "feature" fixed heights (an attribute I almost never need on a table > that really screws up the table's dynamic layout and wastes lost of > time analyzing/repairing). > > These two improvements alone might make the upgrade worthwhile. > > Thanks, > >
- Next message: Steve Easton: "Re: Need some help for this...."
- Previous message: BobA: "Re: site map sort order"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Bob: "Table Pixel Widths/Heights - better in FP 2003 ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|