Table Pixel Widths/Heights - better in FP 2003 ?
From: Bob (uctraingNOSPAM_at_ultranet.com)
Date: 04/02/04
- Next message: Terry Pinnell: "Re: From Word to HTM ?"
- Previous message: Crash Gordon®: "Re: Too many merhant account options for newbie"
- Next in thread: Steve Easton: "Re: Table Pixel Widths/Heights - better in FP 2003 ?"
- Reply: Steve Easton: "Re: Table Pixel Widths/Heights - better in FP 2003 ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 15:27:43 GMT
Fixed pixel table questions:
Does FP2003 handle the pixel adjustments on table cell widths better
than FP-XP and previous versions ? I build tables and use on screen
adjustment to rough in the appearance. FP-XP/2000 do some very strange
things with sizing and a table of 590 pixels often ends up with cells
that total over 1000 pixels. Have they fixed this issue ?
Also, does FP2003 still put (those highly annoying) heights on tables
and cells at random times for no apparent reason ? I never use the
height adjustments in FP but I often end up with cells and tables that
"feature" fixed heights (an attribute I almost never need on a table
that really screws up the table's dynamic layout and wastes lost of
time analyzing/repairing).
These two improvements alone might make the upgrade worthwhile.
Thanks,
- Next message: Terry Pinnell: "Re: From Word to HTM ?"
- Previous message: Crash Gordon®: "Re: Too many merhant account options for newbie"
- Next in thread: Steve Easton: "Re: Table Pixel Widths/Heights - better in FP 2003 ?"
- Reply: Steve Easton: "Re: Table Pixel Widths/Heights - better in FP 2003 ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|