Re: Frames
From: Crash Gordon® (NOVIAGRAPLEASEwebmaster_at_siriussystems.com)
Date: 03/26/04
- Next message: Steve Easton: "Re: Thanks, Steve Easton for the fix"
- Previous message: Jon Spivey: "Re: Converting Layers to Table, Centring on Page"
- In reply to: John: "Re: Frames"
- Next in thread: Louie Warren: "Frames"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 06:51:11 -0700
how do you handle bookmarking and goofy backpaging?
not to mention search engines?
"John" <use_net@darkroompro.com> wrote in message news:vgg7601pi7o8vff840hk73ffvspii442i9@4ax.com...
| On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 20:12:50 -0700, Crash Gordon®
| <NOVIAGRAPLEASEwebmaster@siriussystems.com> wrote:
|
| >Why do you want to use frames?
| >IMO they are way more trouble than they are worth.
|
| I completely disagree. A site can take significant advantage
| of framing to maximize the organization of the files. IMO, it's most
| unfortunate that frames have a bad rep. When combined with stylesheets
| they can really speed up the loading of a site by minimizing
| redundancy.
|
|
| Regards,
|
| John S. Douglas, Photographer - http://www.darkroompro.com
| Please remove the "_" when replying via email
- Next message: Steve Easton: "Re: Thanks, Steve Easton for the fix"
- Previous message: Jon Spivey: "Re: Converting Layers to Table, Centring on Page"
- In reply to: John: "Re: Frames"
- Next in thread: Louie Warren: "Frames"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|