Re: Missing VFP9.0 print jobs
- From: Leemi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Lee Mitchell)
- Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 15:19:23 GMT
Hi Nico:
No, I don't have any suggestions. However, I do have a question. Does the
report print if you exit Visual FoxPro?
By the way, have youtried opening the report with a SE command cna clearing
the Expr, Tag and Tag2 fields?
138396 How to use the default Windows printer in Visual FoxPro
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;138396
I hope this helps.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Sincerely,
Microsoft FoxPro Technical Support
Lee Mitchell
*-- VFP9 HAS ARRIVED!! --*
Read about all the new features of VFP9 here:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/vfoxpro/
*--Purchase VFP 9.0 here:
http://www.microsoft.com/PRODUCTS/info/product.aspx?view=22&pcid=54787e64-52
69-4500-8bf2-3f06689f4ab3&type=ovr
Keep an eye on the product lifecycle for Visual FoxPro here:
http://support.microsoft.com/gp/lifeselectindex
- VFP5 Mainstream Support retired June 30th, 2003
- VFP6 Mainstream Support retired Sept. 30th, 2003
>Hi Lee,
>We have now tested with a SET PRINTER TO immediately afer the REPORT FORM
>command.
>The exact code is:
>SET PRINTER TO DEFAULT
>SET PRINTER TO
>REPORT FORM ("&lcReport") &tcCommand
>SET PRINTER TO && release print job
>This doesn't work, no physical print.
>I decided to do another test, using a 3th party print engine (latest
>evulation version of xfrx). For test purposes I replaced the code above
>with:
> LOCAL lcPrinter, loObj, loXFF
> loObj = EVALUATE("xfrx('XFRX#LISTENER')")
>* Output to a temporary file
> loObj.targetType = "XFF"
> loObj.targetFileName = ""
> REPORT FORM &lcReport OBJECT loObj
> loXFF = loObj.oxfDocument
>* Send the document to a printer
> lcPrinter = SET("Printer", 3) && get default printer
> loXFF.printDocument(lcPrinter,"Mod4U", 1, 10000)
>We now observed that the document prints if using xfrx as external print
>engine. However, in that situation the layout differs too much from the
>original (wordwrap is different), so, using xfrx for printing would mean
>that a lot of .frx files needs to be modified.
>It looks like there is a problem in either the .frx or the VFP printing
>engine.
>Lee; do you have any suggestions based on this information ?
>Nico>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Missing VFP9.0 print jobs
- From: Nico den Boer
- Re: Missing VFP9.0 print jobs
- References:
- Missing VFP9.0 print jobs
- From: Nico den Boer
- RE: Missing VFP9.0 print jobs
- From: Lee Mitchell
- Re: Missing VFP9.0 print jobs
- From: Nico den Boer
- Re: Missing VFP9.0 print jobs
- From: Lee Mitchell
- Re: Missing VFP9.0 print jobs
- From: Nico den Boer
- Missing VFP9.0 print jobs
- Prev by Date: Re: Missing VFP9.0 print jobs
- Next by Date: Re: Missing VFP9.0 print jobs
- Previous by thread: Re: Missing VFP9.0 print jobs
- Next by thread: Re: Missing VFP9.0 print jobs
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|