Re: Index Sequence
- From: "Fred Taylor" <ftaylor@xxxxxxxx!REMOVE>
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 18:17:36 -0700
Try doing a GO RECNO() somewhere in your code, like where you're doing your
grid.Refresh() (just before it).
--
Fred
Microsoft Visual FoxPro MVP
"Andy Trezise" <andy@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:uYkHJut6FHA.1420@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Yes I refresh the grid but it has no immediate effect....it's not until
> you scroll up / down etc that the sequence is corrected
>
> "Olaf Doschke" <T2xhZi5Eb3NjaGtlQFNldG1pY3MuZGU@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
> message news:urTbxRq6FHA.3048@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Hi Andy,
>>
>>> Just wondered if anyone else had seen this behaviour and whether there
>>> was a way around it.
>>>
>>> I don't want to loose the functionality that buffering brings but it
>>> sometimes seems more hassle than it's worth.
>>
>> I'd say the grid has more to do with it, than the
>> buffering. If you refresh() the grid after adding the
>> new record, does it sort "immediately"?
>>
>> Bye, Olaf.
>>
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Index Sequence
- From: Andy Trezise
- Re: Index Sequence
- References:
- Index Sequence
- From: Andy Trezise
- Re: Index Sequence
- From: Andy Trezise
- Index Sequence
- Prev by Date: record empty/oplock
- Next by Date: Re: oledb-group by
- Previous by thread: Re: Index Sequence
- Next by thread: Re: Index Sequence
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading