Re: VFP With XP/98
From: Brian Copeland (bccopeland_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 09/08/04
- Previous message: Cindy Winegarden: "Re: VFP With XP/98"
- In reply to: Cindy Winegarden: "Re: VFP With XP/98"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 7 Sep 2004 20:07:35 -0700
Cindy,
That's exactly how this is set up. We've recommended that the client
upgrade the Win98 machine to XP. We've been a little gun-shy of the
TABLEVALIDATE approach because of the potential to overwrite an
un-flushed record.
Any other ideas or suggestions?
Thanks to all.
"Cindy Winegarden" <cindy.winegarden@mvps.org> wrote in message news:<uBpD6ZSlEHA.1936@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl>...
> Hi Brian,
>
> I'm not sure if it's related but people have reported problems when using a
> peer-to-peer network with a Win98 machine as the "server" and WinXP machines
> as the clients.
>
> --
> Cindy Winegarden MCSD, Microsoft Visual FoxPro MVP
> cindy.winegarden@mvps.org www.cindywinegarden.com
>
>
> "Brian Copeland" <bccopeland@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:e34c4464.0409070750.3309365b@posting.google.com...
> > What we see happening is that when the Visual Foxpro data resides on a
> > Windows '98 computer (we are using free tables, not a .DBC, if that
> > matters), there is an issue when accessing the data using more than
> > other Windows XP workstation. ....
- Previous message: Cindy Winegarden: "Re: VFP With XP/98"
- In reply to: Cindy Winegarden: "Re: VFP With XP/98"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|