Re: Using Native VFP Tables and Network Performance



Hi,

our network guy is reading this and laughing.
Your numbers are not so not much (compared to some of our apps :-).
A server here handles a VFP8 prog. with 80 Users , each 40-50 files opened
(and wordfiles, and ftp,,and email, and....)

I would suggest the following check :
Ask the users to stop all other software for the test.
Login and let one user after the other start work and see whether
performance of the fox app. becomes significantly (!) worse and worse.
Try to log, whats hapening ion the net (trafic, collisions,..), it could be
a "damaged" network controller card resulting in collision issues.

Other trafic issues resulting in small performance :
Printing big files (like powerpoint, could be 150 MB for 10 pages)
Massive internet use (surfing, mails with big attachements, live streams)
there are tools to measure network traffic snd show them in nice graphs
(e.g.:netman)

If only the fox network performance is an issue
Antivirus is always woth to be shut down on foxpro data.
I remember an old advice to make the exe read only and to have the DBC (if
not only free tables) locally generated on a local drive,



HTH
Tom


"Jeff Grippe" <jeff@xxxxxxxxx> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:7rCdnQFHU8jMpGjanZ2dnUVZ_h2pnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hello and thanks in advance for the help.

We are using VFP 7.0 SP1 and native VFP tables. All users are running Win
XP Pro SP2 and our file server is running Win 2003 Server.

We are running a network with about 30 users. Each user has 3 or 4 VFP
apps open with each app opening up to 40 tables. Most tables have memo
fields so each table opens 3 files. There are some forms with private data
sessions that open their own copies of from 25-30 tables (with memo
fields). Some of these forms are opened and closed repeatedly throughout
the day.

Are there any performance issues with using VFP tables and Win 2003 server
as I have outlined above? We are attempting to figure out why we are
having network performance issues and it has been suggested that the large
number of open files caused by the configuration that I have outlined
could be impacting network performance severely. Does anyone know if this
could be the case or if there are special configuration issues for Win
2003 Server that should be applied when using a large number of native VFP
tables.

Thank you very much.

Regards,
Jeff





.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: J2ME or network programming or...what do you recommend?
    ... It was more 'J2EE' I was thinking of in my ... offers network connections to other places, ... OK - J2ME apps. ... thin client GUI - so there is ...
    (comp.lang.java.programmer)
  • Re: Getting Autoincrement ID in ADO.NET
    ... I'm only guessing that statefull is better for windows apps where the data ... source is on a local network and stateless is better for web apps.. ... Layer built for a windows app where SQL Server is on the local network. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.adonet)
  • Re: VFP open table corruption
    ... backup and audit trail, but I'm scared of it happening again. ... Just never seen any corruption that comprehensive before. ... everything went nuts - apps crashing everywhere. ... The network is having a few problems I admit, ...
    (microsoft.public.fox.programmer.exchange)
  • Re: Questions about .NET Deployment Models (i.e. ClickOnce)
    ... dll's on the network, you are talking about using remoting or (my personal ... you plan to deploy client apps outside of the intranet. ... I would highly recommend that you embrace the model that ClickOnce will make ... Deployment of new program versions and new DLL's is easy for us, ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework)
  • Re: Windows cannot find C: (doc) Make sure you typed the name cor
    ... default printer back to my brother network printer. ... Cannot be removed- message "The connected state of Office Add-ins ... uninstall the printer driver, and then install the latest version of ... from Outlook email - it opens a blank page in Word 2007 and you ...
    (microsoft.public.word.application.errors)