Re: Which is faster - COPY FILE or XXCopy?
- From: Man-wai Chang ToDie <toylet.toylet@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:32:34 +0800
if there is/was a reason for XCOPY being no faster than COPY, it's the cache, aka SMARTDRV in DOS days.
But still, there is an issue with number of drive head movement.
--
@~@ Might, Courage, Vision, SINCERITY.
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and Farce be with you!
/( _ )\ (Xubuntu 7.04) Linux 2.6.22.8
^ ^ 12:32:01 up 15:22 0 users load average: 0.00 0.01 0.00
news://news.3home.net news://news.hkpcug.org news://news.newsgroup.com.hk
.
- References:
- Which is faster - COPY FILE or XXCopy?
- From: Steve Meyerson
- Re: Which is faster - COPY FILE or XXCopy?
- From: Man-wai Chang ToDie
- Re: Which is faster - COPY FILE or XXCopy?
- From: Steve Meyerson
- Re: Which is faster - COPY FILE or XXCopy?
- From: Man-wai Chang ToDie
- Which is faster - COPY FILE or XXCopy?
- Prev by Date: Re: Which is faster - COPY FILE or XXCopy?
- Next by Date: Re: Which is faster - COPY FILE or XXCopy?
- Previous by thread: Re: Which is faster - COPY FILE or XXCopy?
- Next by thread: Re: Which is faster - COPY FILE or XXCopy?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading