Which is faster - COPY FILE or XXCopy?
- From: Steve Meyerson <stevemeyerson@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 23:31:33 GMT
I'm rewriting a routine in VFP8 (XP Pro) to back up about 4,000 small
files, averaqing about 5k each, from about 5 folders from the hard
disk to a USB mini hard drive. I'm considering two approaches:
1. Using XXCopy.exe with the RUN command or ShellExedute.
2. Using only the built-in COPY FILE command.
I have a feeling XXCopy would be faster, but I haven't tested it.
Could someone confirm that? Or is it an "it depends" situation in
which case I'll go ahead and test it.
Thanks for any help.
Steve M.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Which is faster - COPY FILE or XXCopy?
- From: Steve Meyerson
- Re: Which is faster - COPY FILE or XXCopy?
- From: Jeff Grippe
- Re: Which is faster - COPY FILE or XXCopy?
- From: Man-wai Chang ToDie
- Re: Which is faster - COPY FILE or XXCopy?
- From: tom knauf
- Re: Which is faster - COPY FILE or XXCopy?
- From: bork
- Re: Which is faster - COPY FILE or XXCopy?
- Prev by Date: Re: RUN Question
- Next by Date: Re: Open Word file in Vista
- Previous by thread: Implementing events members of and Activex
- Next by thread: Re: Which is faster - COPY FILE or XXCopy?
- Index(es):
Loading