Re: Locate vs Seek Command
- From: Man-wai Chang ToDie <toylet.toylet@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 20:28:54 +0800
Is is a good idea to change the seek commands with locate commands in
order to avoid generating indexes, are CDX files necessary on free
tables. should I expect performance problems with this change?
If the DBF has the right indexes on the fields, LOCATE could be till as
fast as SEEK and remains more flexible.
--
@~@ Might, Courage, Vision, SINCERITY.
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and Farce be with you!
/( _ )\ (Xubuntu 7.04) Linux 2.6.22.6
^ ^ 20:26:01 up 9 days 10:45 1 user load average: 0.05 0.01 0.00
news://news.3home.net news://news.hkpcug.org news://news.newsgroup.com.hk
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Locate vs Seek Command
- From: Cy Welch
- Re: Locate vs Seek Command
- From: MikeA
- Re: Locate vs Seek Command
- References:
- Locate vs Seek Command
- From: Texeira
- Locate vs Seek Command
- Prev by Date: Re: Slow Accessing a memo field on a network
- Next by Date: Re: ActiveX and Socket Programming
- Previous by thread: Re: Locate vs Seek Command
- Next by thread: Re: Locate vs Seek Command
- Index(es):