Re: DBC mixed with Free tables performance
- From: "Dan" <dan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:09:27 -0400
My tables are on a network drive. I am currently working with test data so
I am the only one accessing it.
"Fred Taylor" <ftaylor@xxxxxxxx!REMOVE> wrote in message
news:e6$nQorpHHA.3952@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
A table in a DBC vs a free table should have no impact on performance.
Where are your tables located? Are they on a network share or local? Are
other people or applications currently accessing them?
--
Fred
Microsoft Visual FoxPro MVP
"Dan" <dan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:usBznSqpHHA.4196@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Can nobody help me?
"Dan" <dan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:OORtfZHpHHA.4496@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I am using VFP9.
I am in the process of creating a database container for my free tables.
I have quite a few tables and would like to implement this
incrementally.
My question is, are there any performance problems with mixing tables in
a dbc with free tables?
I have a query that uses 4 tables to get some data. When running it
against my free tables it runs in under a second. When I run the query
against the same 4 tables only with two of them now added to the
database container the query takes over 30 seconds. I am not sure why
this is happening. SYS(3054) reports the same optimization for both
queries.
Please help...
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: DBC mixed with Free tables performance
- From: Fred Taylor
- Re: DBC mixed with Free tables performance
- References:
- DBC mixed with Free tables performance
- From: Dan
- Re: DBC mixed with Free tables performance
- From: Dan
- Re: DBC mixed with Free tables performance
- From: Fred Taylor
- DBC mixed with Free tables performance
- Prev by Date: Re: RUNNING XXCOPY.EXE
- Next by Date: Re: RUNNING XXCOPY.EXE
- Previous by thread: Re: DBC mixed with Free tables performance
- Next by thread: Re: DBC mixed with Free tables performance
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|