Re: update VFP9 & update SQLServer 2005
- From: Man-wai Chang <toylet.toylet@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2006 13:38:43 +0800
I think it is an error to depend on the execution order. As I understand it,
a SQL statement should be considered as operating all-at-once, and no
assumptions can be made about the sequence of execution of its parts.
I think it's a dangerous idea to assume parallelism by default. Anyway,
I don't control technology in the States. :)
--
.~. Might, Courage, Vision, SINCERITY. http://www.linux-sxs.org
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and Farce be with you!
/( _ )\ (Ubuntu 6.10) Linux 2.6.19
^ ^ 13:37:01 up 6 days 16:52 1 user load average: 1.00 1.02 1.00
news://news.3home.net news://news.hkpcug.org news://news.newsgroup.com.hk
.
- References:
- update VFP9 & update SQLServer 2005
- From: T.Kwoka
- Re: update VFP9 & update SQLServer 2005
- From: Paul Pedersen
- update VFP9 & update SQLServer 2005
- Prev by Date: Re: Old FPW26 program
- Next by Date: Need in event of item selecting in a combo box
- Previous by thread: Re: update VFP9 & update SQLServer 2005
- Next by thread: Re: update VFP9 & update SQLServer 2005
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|