Re: Future of VFP (yet again)
- From: "Paul Pedersen" <no-reply@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 12:01:56 -0800
"tony miller" <tony_becky_mikey@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:C%Rjf.2558$w74.952@xxxxxxxxxxx
> I will say it again, for those who think I am being Ant-Fox here.. It has
> its place, but when everyone seems to be wanting a browser based
> application, and the tools are heading farther in that directions, why
> would you stay in the desktop environment?
Maybe I'm the only one, but I generally find browser interfaces to be
enormously irritating, from a user's pov. Desktop interfaces are just more
friendly, easier to use, and faster.
That doesn't mean that browser interfaces won't take over. I'm just making
an observation.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Future of VFP (yet again)
- From: Josh Assing
- Re: Future of VFP (yet again)
- References:
- Re: Future of VFP (yet again)
- From: tony miller
- Re: Future of VFP (yet again)
- From: Matthew L Reed
- Re: Future of VFP (yet again)
- From: tony miller
- Re: Future of VFP (yet again)
- Prev by Date: Re: what's wrong with this "copy to" line
- Next by Date: Re: what's wrong with this "copy to" line
- Previous by thread: Re: Future of VFP (yet again)
- Next by thread: Re: Future of VFP (yet again)
- Index(es):
Loading