Re: Migration from XBase++ to Visual FoxPro 9
- From: "Paul Pedersen" <no-reply@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 12:35:36 -0700
I had one once, many years ago. Old version, obviously - it might even have
been FPW2.6, I don't remember now.
We've had this discussion before. Maybe you're doing it wrong. ;-)
"Ook" <no usenet spam at zoot al dot com> wrote in message
news:uFqEr71oFHA.3996@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sooner or later it will bite you. I've seen several index problems that
> REINDEX did not fix, but deleting and recreating the CDX did fix.
>
> "Paul Pedersen" <no-reply@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:e9Azxi1oFHA.3304@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>I use REINDEX all the time. Never have any trouble with it.
>>
>>
>> "man-wai chang" <toylet.toylet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:O6xiqXzoFHA.1872@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> I seem to have random index problems. The problem will not be there and
>>>> then it shows up. I then delete the index file and reindex with the
>>>> XBase++
>>>
>>> Did you really mean "REINDEX"? Don't reindex. Delete all old index and
>>> tags. Rebuild it from scratch using the same expression. Use CDX index
>>> tag.
>>>
>>> --
>>> .~. Might, Courage, Vision. http://www.linux-sxs.org
>>> / v \
>>> /( _ )\ Linux 2.4.31
>>> ^ ^ 10:12pm up 2 days 41 min load average: 1.74 1.71 1.70
>>
>>
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Migration from XBase++ to Visual FoxPro 9
- From: Michael Wheat
- Re: Migration from XBase++ to Visual FoxPro 9
- From: man-wai chang
- Re: Migration from XBase++ to Visual FoxPro 9
- From: Paul Pedersen
- Re: Migration from XBase++ to Visual FoxPro 9
- From: Ook
- Migration from XBase++ to Visual FoxPro 9
- Prev by Date: Re: Migration from XBase++ to Visual FoxPro 9
- Next by Date: Re: Connecting To DBF Using vfpoledb
- Previous by thread: Re: Migration from XBase++ to Visual FoxPro 9
- Next by thread: Re: Migration from XBase++ to Visual FoxPro 9
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|