Re: SQL Select: Very Fast in VFP8, Very Slow in VFP9
- From: "Paul Pedersen" <no-reply@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 09:13:08 -0700
"Thomas Ganss"
<tganss_at_t_dash_online_dot_de-remove-all-after-first-real-dash@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote in message news:d3tpq8$fjl$00$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Also Indices built with Str() are not optimizable in vfp9,
Really? Why would that be? Is that documented somewhere?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SQL Select: Very Fast in VFP8, Very Slow in VFP9
- From: Rick Bean
- Re: SQL Select: Very Fast in VFP8, Very Slow in VFP9
- References:
- SQL Select: Very Fast in VFP8, Very Slow in VFP9
- From: David
- Re: SQL Select: Very Fast in VFP8, Very Slow in VFP9
- From: David
- Re: SQL Select: Very Fast in VFP8, Very Slow in VFP9
- From: Thomas Ganss
- SQL Select: Very Fast in VFP8, Very Slow in VFP9
- Prev by Date: alternatives vs DBI technologies schedule libraries for VFP
- Next by Date: Re: Adding parameters to base methods
- Previous by thread: Re: SQL Select: Very Fast in VFP8, Very Slow in VFP9
- Next by thread: Re: SQL Select: Very Fast in VFP8, Very Slow in VFP9
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|